Full Judgment
1. We are of opinion that the view of the Board of Revenue is correct, and that refund may be given under Section 51 (d), (6) of the Stamp Act.
In Re:
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/795746
- Court
- Chennai
- Judge
- Arthur J.H. Collins, Kt., C.J., ;Muttusami Ayyar, ;Parker and ;Wilkinson, JJ.
- Decided On
- Aug 09, 1892
- Subject
- Property
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Stamp Act - Act I of 1879, Section 51(d), (6). -
- Key legal issue
- Property
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re:
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1893)ILR16Mad459
Excerpt
stamp act - act i of 1879, section 51(d), (6). - 1. we are of opinion that the view of the board of revenue is correct, and that refund may be given under section 51 (d), (6) of the stamp act.