Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

U S Vs. Lancaster

U S vs Lancaster

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1820
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78873

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
18 U.S. 434
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

U S

Respondent

Lancaster

Excerpt

u s v. lancaster - 18 u.s. 434 (1820) u.s. supreme court u s v. lancaster, 18 u.s. 434 (1820) 18 u.s. 434 (wheat.) the united states v. lancaster. march 17, 1820 error to the circuit court of pennsylvania. this was an action of debt originally brought in the district court, and carried by writ of error to the circuit court, from which it was brought to this court, upon a case agreed by the parties, and a certificate that the opinions of the judges were opposed upon a question arising in the cause. march 10th. the cause was argued by mr. c. j. ingersoll, for the plaintiffs, and by mr. sergeant, for the defendant. march 17th. mr. chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court, that it had no jurisdiction of the cause, as the district judge could not sit in the circuit court on a writ of error from his own decision, and consequently there could be no division of opinion to be certified to this court.a a neither can a cause be brought to this court by writ of error, which has been carried from the district to the circuit court by writ of error. the united states v. barker, ante, vol. ii, p. 395. page 18 u.s. 434, 435 judgment. this cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the circuit court for the district of pennsylvania, and was argued by counsel. on consideration whereof, it was adjudged and ordered, that the said cause be remanded to the said circuit court, it not appearing from the said transcript that this court has jurisdiction in said cause.

Full Judgment

U S v. LANCASTER - 18 U.S. 434 (1820)
U.S. Supreme Court U S v. LANCASTER, 18 U.S. 434 (1820)

18 U.S. 434 (Wheat.)

The UNITED STATES
v.
LANCASTER.

March 17, 1820

ERROR to the Circuit Court of Pennsylvania.

This was an action of debt originally brought in the District Court, and carried by writ of error to the Circuit Court, from which it was brought to this Court, upon a case agreed by the parties, and a certificate that the opinions of the judges were opposed upon a question arising in the cause.

March 10th.

The cause was argued by Mr. C. J. Ingersoll, for the plaintiffs, and by Mr. Sergeant, for the defendant.

March 17th.

Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court, that it had no jurisdiction of the cause, as the District Judge could not sit in the Circuit Court on a writ of error from his own decision, and consequently there could be no division of opinion to be certified to this Court.a

a Neither can a cause be brought to this Court by writ of error, which has been carried from the District to the Circuit Court by writ of error. The United States v. Barker, Ante, Vol. II, p. 395.

Page 18 U.S. 434, 435

JUDGMENT. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it was ADJUDGED and ORDERED, that the said cause be remanded to the said Circuit Court, it not appearing from the said transcript that this Court has jurisdiction in said cause.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial