Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: M.L. Dalmia

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Chennai Decided Jul 11, 1951
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/787680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Revision Case No. 1321 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 1249 of 1950
Subject
Labour and Industrial
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - Failure to pay for this extra period constitutes an offence.

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed
Acts & sections
Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 7 and 9

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: M.L. Dalmia

Advocate S.K.L. Ratan, Adv.;State Prosecutor

Legal References

Acts
Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 7 and 9
Reported In
AIR1952Mad197; (1951)2MLJ525

Excerpt

- - failure to pay for this extra period constitutes an offence.ordersomasundaram, j.1. the main contention of the learned advocate for the petitioner is that the words 'subject to the provisions of this act' in section 9 must be read with section 7 of the act and therefore if the workman works for the extra period of 15 minutes mentioned in section 7, no extra wages need be paid. i am unable to agree with this contention. section 7 deals only with the time to be taken for serving a waiting customer, if he happens to come to the shop at about the closing time allowed by law. it is an indulgence granted for the advantage of the employer. but section 9 deals with extra wages to be paid to the workmen when they work for more than 8 hours a day. undoubtedly for the 15 minutes allowed to the employer to serve a waiting customer if the workman works and if it is beyond the 8 hours of his work then he is certainly entitled to extra wages for that brief period of 15 minutes. failure to pay for this extra period constitutes an offence. the conviction is therefore correct and the fine is not excessive. the petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Somasundaram, J.

1. The main contention of the learned Advocate for the petitioner is that the words 'subject to the provisions of this Act' in Section 9 must be read with Section 7 of the Act and therefore if the workman works for the extra period of 15 minutes mentioned in Section 7, no extra wages need be paid. I am unable to agree with this contention. Section 7 deals only with the time to be taken for serving a waiting customer, if he happens to come to the shop at about the closing time allowed by law. It is an indulgence granted for the advantage of the employer. But Section 9 deals with extra wages to be paid to the workmen when they work for more than 8 hours a day. Undoubtedly for the 15 minutes allowed to the employer to serve a waiting customer if the workman works and if it is beyond the 8 hours of his work then he is certainly entitled to extra wages for that brief period of 15 minutes. Failure to pay for this extra period constitutes an offence. The conviction is therefore correct and the fine is not excessive. The petition is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial