Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Ariadne

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1817
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78748

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
15 U.S. 143
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Ariadne

Excerpt

.....alexandria to cadiz with a license or passport of protection from the british admiral sawyer. the vessel and cargo were restored in the district court, page 15 u. s. 144 but on appeal, sentence of condemnation was pronounced by the circuit court, from which sentence an appeal was entered to this court. page 15 u. s. 147 mr. justice washington delivered the opinion of the court. the view of the court is that this case cannot be distinguished from those already decided. it is alleged that the flour was not actually destined to the use of the enemy, but whether any part of it went to his use or not is immaterial. it is indeed possible that cadiz might have fallen without the aid of these supplies, and therefore, in fact, great britain and her ally may have been relieved by these supplies from the pressure of the war in that quarter. the court, however, in the cases alluded to, proceeded on a broader ground: all the judges who concurred in those decisions were of opinion that the mere sailing under an enemy's license, without regard to the object of the voyage or the port of destination, constituted of itself an act of illegality which subjected the property to confiscation. it was an attempt by one individual of a belligerent country to clothe himself with a neutral character page 15 u. s. 148 by the license of the other belligerent and thus to separate himself from the common character of his own country. sentence affirmed.

Full Judgment

The Ariadne - 15 U.S. 143 (1817)
U.S. Supreme Court The Ariadne, 15 U.S. 2 Wheat. 143 143 (1817)

The Ariadne

15 U.S. (2 Wheat.) 143

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SYLLABUS

The sailing under the enemy's license constitutes, of itself, an act of illegality which "subjects the property to confiscation without regard to the object of the voyage of the port of destination."

This vessel, belonging to citizens of the United States and laden with a cargo of flour also belonging to citizens of the same, was captured on 15 October, 1812, on a voyage from Alexandria to Cadiz with a license or passport of protection from the British admiral Sawyer. The vessel and cargo were restored in the district court,

Page 15 U. S. 144

but on appeal, sentence of condemnation was pronounced by the circuit court, from which sentence an appeal was entered to this Court.

Page 15 U. S. 147

MR. JUSTICE WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The view of the Court is that this case cannot be distinguished from those already decided. It is alleged that the flour was not actually destined to the use of the enemy, but whether any part of it went to his use or not is immaterial. It is indeed possible that Cadiz might have fallen without the aid of these supplies, and therefore, in fact, Great Britain and her ally may have been relieved by these supplies from the pressure of the war in that quarter. The court, however, in the cases alluded to, proceeded on a broader ground: all the judges who concurred in those decisions were of opinion that the mere sailing under an enemy's license, without regard to the object of the voyage or the port of destination, constituted of itself an act of illegality which subjected the property to confiscation. It was an attempt by one individual of a belligerent country to clothe himself with a neutral character

Page 15 U. S. 148

by the license of the other belligerent and thus to separate himself from the common character of his own country.

Sentence affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial