Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramamirtha Ayyan Vs. Gopala Ayyan

Ramamirtha Ayyan vs Gopala Ayyan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 15, 1896
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/786920

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Transfer of Property Act - Act IV of 1882, Section 123--Registered gift of land--Natural love and affection--Donor retracts consent prior to registration--Compulsory registration--Effect of. -

Key legal issue
Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramamirtha Ayyan

Respondent

Gopala Ayyan

Legal References

Reported In
(1896)ILR19Mad433

Excerpt

transfer of property act - act iv of 1882, section 123--registered gift of land--natural love and affection--donor retracts consent prior to registration--compulsory registration--effect of. - 1. we have no doubt that a deed of gift is not complete until it has been registered as required by section 123 of the transfer of property act, and that it only operates upon registration. in this ease the deed of gift was not registered until the sale had been completed and, therefore, was not effectual as against the deed of sale.2. we are further of opinion that a deed of gift being a voluntary transfer remains nudum pactum until the donor has done all that is necessary to make it legally complete. to do so, it is necessary, inter alia, that it should be registered; but he can be no more compelled to register the deed than to execute it in the first instance. the registration of the present deed contrary to the supposed donor's wishes, which was ordered by the registrar, was therefore void. we accordingly hold there was no gift, and reverse the decision of the subordinate judge and restore that of the munsif. the appellant's costs in this court and in the first appellate court must be paid by the respondent.

Full Judgment

1. We have no doubt that a deed of gift is not complete until it has been registered as required by Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, and that it only operates upon registration. In this ease the deed of gift was not registered until the sale had been completed and, therefore, was not effectual as against the deed of sale.

2. We are further of opinion that a deed of gift being a voluntary transfer remains nudum pactum until the donor has done all that is necessary to make it legally complete. To do so, it is necessary, inter alia, that it should be registered; but he can be no more compelled to register the deed than to execute it in the first instance. The registration of the present deed contrary to the supposed donor's wishes, which was ordered by the Registrar, was therefore void. We accordingly hold there was no gift, and reverse the decision of the Subordinate Judge and restore that of the Munsif. The appellant's costs in this Court and in the first Appellate Court must be paid by the respondent.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial