Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Blackwell Vs. Patten

Blackwell vs Patten

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1812
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78553

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
11 U.S. 277
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Blackwell

Respondent

Patten

Excerpt

blackwell v. patten - 11 u.s. 277 (1812) u.s. supreme court blackwell v. patten, 11 u.s. 277 (1812) 11 u.s. 277 (cranch) blackwell v. patten and others. march 13, 1812 jones, for the defendants in error, moved this court to dismiss the writ of error, because it bore teste of february term, 1810, was issued in september, 1810, and was returnable to february term, 1811, whereas it ought to have been tested of august term, 1810. the plaintiff in error, aware of this objection, has sued out another writ of error, which stands on a subsequent part of the docket. page 11 u.s. 277, 278 campbell, on the same side. august term is as much a term for teste and return of writs as february term. suppose the writ bore teste ten years ago: it might as well be made returnable to february term, 1811, as this writ which bore teste of february term, 1810. if tested of february term, 1810, it ought to have been returnable to august term, 1810, and not to february term, 1811. the appearance of the defendants in error only cures the want of a citation, not a fault in the writ of error itself. march 14th. all the judges being present, the court refused to quash or dismiss the writ of error on account of the irregularity of its teste.

Full Judgment

BLACKWELL v. PATTEN - 11 U.S. 277 (1812)
U.S. Supreme Court BLACKWELL v. PATTEN, 11 U.S. 277 (1812)

11 U.S. 277 (Cranch)

BLACKWELL
v.
PATTEN AND OTHERS.

March 13, 1812

JONES, for the Defendants in error, moved this Court to dismiss the writ of error, because it bore teste of February term, 1810, was issued in September, 1810, and was returnable to February term, 1811, whereas it ought to have been tested of August term, 1810. The Plaintiff in error, aware of this objection, has sued out another writ of error, which stands on a subsequent part of the docket.

Page 11 U.S. 277, 278

CAMPBELL, on the same side. August term is as much a term for teste and return of writs as February term. Suppose the writ bore teste ten years ago: it might as well be made returnable to February term, 1811, as this writ which bore teste of February term, 1810. If tested of February term, 1810, it ought to have been returnable to August term, 1810, and not to February term, 1811.

The appearance of the Defendants in error only cures the want of a citation, not a fault in the writ of error itself.

March 14th. All the Judges being present,

The COURT refused to quash or dismiss the writ of error on account of the irregularity of its teste.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial