Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Respublica Vs. Roberts

Respublica vs Roberts

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1791
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78021

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
2 U.S. 124
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Respublica

Respondent

Roberts

Excerpt

respublica v. roberts - 2 u.s. 124 (1791) u.s. supreme court respublica v. roberts, 2 u.s. 124 (1791) 2 u.s. 124 (dall.) respublica v. roberts supreme court of pennsylvania april term, 1791 this was an indictment for adultery, which had been found in the quarter sessions, of bucks county. the woman was married; but the indictment did not state the defendant to be so; and, indeed, the contrary was allowed, in the course of the argument, to be the fact. the question brought before this court was, whether in such circumstances, the defendant would be convicted and sentenced for adultery, under the act of assembly? 1 vol. p. 47. dall. edit. the attorney page 2 u.s. 124, 125 general contending for the affirmative of the proposition, and serjeant opposing it. the court, after consideration, delivered an unanimous opinion, that under the act of assembly, and the uniform practice of eighty-five years ( a practice, which, though it does not make the law, must be strong evidence of what the law is) the indictment could not be supported on the charge of adultery: but that the judgment for fornication only, must be pronounced against the defendant. judgment accordingly.

Full Judgment

RESPUBLICA v. ROBERTS - 2 U.S. 124 (1791)
U.S. Supreme Court RESPUBLICA v. ROBERTS, 2 U.S. 124 (1791)

2 U.S. 124 (Dall.)

Respublica
v.
Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1791

This was an indictment for adultery, which had been found in the Quarter Sessions, of Bucks County. The woman was married; but the indictment did not state the defendant to be so; and, indeed, the contrary was allowed, in the course of the argument, to be the fact. The question brought before this Court was, whether in such circumstances, the defendant would be convicted and sentenced for adultery, under the act of Assembly? 1 Vol. p. 47. Dall. Edit. the Attorney

Page 2 U.S. 124, 125

General contending for the affirmative of the proposition, and Serjeant opposing it.

The Court, after consideration, delivered an unanimous opinion, that under the act of Assembly, and the uniform practice of eighty-five years ( a practice, which, though it does not make the law, must be strong evidence of what the law is) the indictment could not be supported on the charge of adultery: But that the judgment for fornication only, must be pronounced against the defendant.

Judgment accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial