Steele Vs. Steele

Steele vs Steele

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1789

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/77975

CiteSignal

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/77975
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1789
Case Number: 1 U.S. 409
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary — not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Steele

Respondent

Steele

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

steele v. steele - 1 u.s. 409 (1789) u.s. supreme court steele v. steele, 1 u.s. 409 (1789) 1 u.s. 409 (dall.) steele v. steele supreme court of pennsylvania january term, 1789 this was an issue joined on the facts alledged in a libel for a divorce; and, upon the trial, the chief justice observed, that notice ought to be given of the facts intended to be proved under the general allegations of the libel. rush, justice; i think it would be most convenient to give notice, that between two specific dates, acts of cruelty &c.; were intended to be proved. the court seemed to adopt that idea, and recommended it for the future practice of the bar.

Full Judgment

STEELE v. STEELE - 1 U.S. 409 (1789)
U.S. Supreme Court STEELE v. STEELE, 1 U.S. 409 (1789)

1 U.S. 409 (Dall.)

Steele
v.
Steele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

January Term, 1789

This was an issue joined on the facts alledged in a libel for a divorce; and, upon the trial, the Chief Justice observed, that notice ought to be given of the facts intended to be proved under the general allegations of the libel.

Rush, Justice;

I think it would be most convenient to give notice, that between two specific dates, acts of cruelty &c.; were intended to be proved.

The Court seemed to adopt that idea, and recommended it for the future practice of the bar.