Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhainron Vs. State of Rajasthan

Bhainron vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Dec 20, 1988
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/771218

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 419 of 1987
Subject
Property
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Rajasthan Agricultural Credit Operations (R & D) Act, 1974 - Sections 12 & 13--Attachment of agricultural property made without prior determination of liability--Held, Authorized Officer was not unauthorized.;Writ Dismissed -

Key legal issue
Property
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhainron

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
2(1989)WLN(Rev)27

Excerpt

rajasthan agricultural credit operations (r & d) act, 1974 - sections 12 & 13--attachment of agricultural property made without prior determination of liability--held, authorized officer was not unauthorized.;writ dismissed - 1. the petitioner has challenged the order annex. 5 of the sdo sambher lake. under the aforesaid order dated 20-1-1987, the property of the petitioner which was mortgaged, has only been attached.2. it may be stated that the rajasthan agricultural credit operation (r and d) act, 1974, (for short the act) was made as a special act enabling the recovery by the financial institutions. section 12 of the aforesaid act removes the bar to attachment and sale by process of court and that section as appears was made because otherwise it would not have been possible to attach and sale agricultural lands. as and when loan is advanced by a financial institution, the property is mortgaged with the bank. if an application for recovery of an amount is made to the authorized officer under the provisions of the act and if he makes an order of attachment, it cannot be said that he had no such power. there is no provision that the attachment order could not be made without first determining the liability, if dispute is raised by agriculturist. so far as the sale of agricultural property is concerned, it can only be made after determination of liability under the provisions of the act.3. we find no merit. dismissed summarily.

Full Judgment

1. The petitioner has challenged the order Annex. 5 of the SDO Sambher lake. Under the aforesaid order dated 20-1-1987, the property of the petitioner which was mortgaged, has only been attached.

2. It may be stated that the Rajasthan Agricultural Credit Operation (R and D) Act, 1974, (for short the Act) was made as a special Act enabling the recovery by the financial institutions. Section 12 of the aforesaid Act removes the bar to attachment and sale by process of court and that section as appears was made because otherwise it would not have been possible to attach and sale agricultural lands. As and when loan is advanced by a financial institution, the property is mortgaged with the bank. If an application for recovery of an amount is made to the Authorized Officer under the provisions of the Act and if he makes an order of attachment, it cannot be said that he had no such power. There is no provision that the attachment order could not be made without first determining the liability, if dispute is raised by agriculturist. So far as the sale of agricultural property is concerned, it can only be made after determination of liability under the provisions of the Act.

3. We find no merit. Dismissed summarily.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial