Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Seil Powergears Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 24, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770266

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B.Company Application No. 38 of 2005
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 2. Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-transferee company and on perusal of the entire record of the application and the additional affidavit, dated 9-7-2005, filed by the Director of the applicant-transferee company, I am satisfied that it is a fit case for dispensing with the meeting of the eq...

Key legal issue
Company
Acts & sections
Companies (Court) Rules, 1956 - Rule 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 393

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Seil Powergears Ltd.

Legal References

Acts
Companies (Court) Rules, 1956 - Rule 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 393
Reported In
[2006]68SCL483(Raj)

Excerpt

- - 2. having heard the learned counsel for the applicant-transferee company and on perusal of the entire record of the application and the additional affidavit, dated 9-7-2005, filed by the director of the applicant-transferee company, i am satisfied that it is a fit case for dispensing with the meeting of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-transferee company.orders.k. keshote, j.1. this is an application under sections 391(1) and 393 of the companies act, 1956 read with rule 9 of the companies (court) rules, 1956 for directions to dispense with the meeting of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-transferee company.2. having heard the learned counsel for the applicant-transferee company and on perusal of the entire record of the application and the additional affidavit, dated 9-7-2005, filed by the director of the applicant-transferee company, i am satisfied that it is a fit case for dispensing with the meeting of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-transferee company. it is not gainsay that it is not the final order in the matter. the equity shareholders and the unsecured creditors may have ample opportunity, if they have any objection against the scheme of amalgamation of transferor company-skipper electricals (india) limited with the applicant-transferee company, when the matter will come up for sanction thereof.3. the application accordingly stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

S.K. Keshote, J.

1. This is an application under Sections 391(1) and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1956 for directions to dispense with the meeting of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-transferee company.

2. Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-transferee company and on perusal of the entire record of the application and the additional affidavit, dated 9-7-2005, filed by the Director of the applicant-transferee company, I am satisfied that it is a fit case for dispensing with the meeting of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant-transferee company. It is not gainsay that it is not the final order in the matter. The equity shareholders and the unsecured creditors may have ample opportunity, if they have any objection against the Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Company-Skipper Electricals (India) Limited with the applicant-transferee company, when the matter will come up for sanction thereof.

3. The application accordingly stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial