Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anil Malik and ors. Vs. Smt. Adarsh Kumari Malik and ors.

Anil Malik and ors. vs Smt. Adarsh Kumari Malik and ors.

Disposition Appeal allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 20, 2009
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769922

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicles
Disposition
Appeal allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 168--Compensation--Adjustment of no fault liability--Amount awarded towards no fault liability cannot be deducted from the amount of compensation awarded for suffering injuries. -

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles
Outcome / disposition
Appeal allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Malik and ors.

Respondent

Smt. Adarsh Kumari Malik and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
2009(3)WLN602

Excerpt

motor vehicles act, 1988 - section 168--compensation--adjustment of no fault liability--amount awarded towards no fault liability cannot be deducted from the amount of compensation awarded for suffering injuries. - g.s. sarraf, j.1. the claimants appellants have filed this appeal against the award dt. 10.09.1999 passed by motor accident claims tribunal and special court dacoity affected area, dholpur in motor accident claim case no. 55/94.2. learned tribunal awarded rs. 56,000/- to the claimant appellant no. 3 reema on account of the injuries suffered by her and rs. 5,000/- each to the claimants appellants nos. 1 to 5 for loss of affection due to the death of one ghanshyam das in an accident on 20.02.1994. out of this total amount of rs. 81,000/- so awarded learned tribunal deducted rs. 50,000/- of interim award on account of no fault liability due to the death of ghanshyam das and thereafter passed an award of rs. 31,000/- in favour of the claimants appellants. 3. heard learned counsels for the parties.4. learned counsel for the claimants appellants submits that the amount of interim award on the ground of no fault liability cannot be deducted from the compensation amount which has been awarded to the claimant appellant no. 3 reema on account of grievous and simple injuries suffered by her and to the claimants appellants nos. 1 to 5 for the loss of affection.5. i fully agree with the submission of learned counsel for the claimants appellants and i find that the order of deducting rs. 50,000/- of interim award from the compensation amount awarded to the claimants appellants is entirely illegal and unwarranted and it therefore deserves to be set aside.6. consequently, the appeal is allowed as above and the order of deducting rs. 50,000/- of no fault liability from rs. 81,000/- is set aside and a total award of rs. 81,000/- is passed in favour of the claimants appellants. the claimants appellant will be entitled to get interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application in the tribunal to the date of deposit/realisation on the difference amount. learned tribunal will pass necessary orders regarding payment/fixed deposit. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

G.S. Sarraf, J.

1. The claimants appellants have filed this appeal against the award dt. 10.09.1999 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special Court Dacoity Affected Area, Dholpur in motor accident Claim Case No. 55/94.

2. Learned Tribunal awarded Rs. 56,000/- to the claimant appellant No. 3 Reema on account of the injuries suffered by her and Rs. 5,000/- each to the claimants appellants Nos. 1 to 5 for loss of affection due to the death of one Ghanshyam Das in an accident on 20.02.1994. Out of this total amount of Rs. 81,000/- so awarded learned Tribunal deducted Rs. 50,000/- of interim award on account of no fault liability due to the death of Ghanshyam Das and thereafter passed an award of Rs. 31,000/- in favour of the claimants appellants.

3. Heard learned Counsels for the parties.

4. Learned Counsel for the claimants appellants submits that the amount of interim award on the ground of no fault liability cannot be deducted from the compensation amount which has been awarded to the claimant appellant No. 3 Reema on account of grievous and simple injuries suffered by her and to the claimants appellants Nos. 1 to 5 for the loss of affection.

5. I fully agree with the submission of learned Counsel for the claimants appellants and I find that the order of deducting Rs. 50,000/- of interim award from the compensation amount awarded to the claimants appellants is entirely illegal and unwarranted and it therefore deserves to be set aside.

6. Consequently, the appeal is allowed as above and the order of deducting Rs. 50,000/- of no fault liability from Rs. 81,000/- is set aside and a total award of Rs. 81,000/- is passed in favour of the claimants appellants. The claimants appellant will be entitled to get interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application in the Tribunal to the date of deposit/realisation on the difference amount. Learned Tribunal will pass necessary orders regarding payment/fixed deposit. No order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial