Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State Vs. Mool Chand

State vs Mool Chand

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Nov 07, 1985
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769846

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 256 of 1975
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 & 7 and Rajasthan Exhibition of Essential Commodities Price and Stock Order, 1966--Sentence--Enhancement of-Offence of not exhibiting of price of goods & stock committed 12 years back--Held, it would not be proper to enhance sentence;Appeal Dismissed. -

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State

Respondent

Mool Chand

Legal References

Reported In
1985WLN(UC)560

Excerpt

essential commodities act, 1955 - sections 3 & 7 and rajasthan exhibition of essential commodities price and stock order, 1966--sentence--enhancement of-offence of not exhibiting of price of goods & stock committed 12 years back--held, it would not be proper to enhance sentence;appeal dismissed. - 1. heard learned public prosecutor. this is an appeal for the state for enhancement of the sentencement of the respondent moolchand, who has been convicted under section 3/7 of the essential commodities act and was sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 50/- and in default to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment by the chief judicial magistrate, jalore vide his judgment dated 22-5-1974. he was found guilty of contravention of the rajasthan exhibition of essential commodities price and stock order, 1966.2. the offence dates back to 29-12-1973. about 12 years has expired, stock of some goods and their price were not exhibited on the board. after lapse of twelve years it would not be just and proper to enhance the sentence awarded to the respondent mool chand.3. the appeal for enhancement of the sentence fails, and, therefore, it is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Heard learned Public Prosecutor. This is an appeal for the State for enhancement of the sentencement of the respondent Moolchand, who has been convicted under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- and in default to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalore vide his judgment dated 22-5-1974. He was found guilty of contravention of the Rajasthan Exhibition of Essential Commodities Price and Stock Order, 1966.

2. The offence dates back to 29-12-1973. About 12 years has expired, stock of some goods and their price were not exhibited on the board. After lapse of twelve years it would not be just and proper to enhance the sentence awarded to the respondent Mool Chand.

3. The appeal for enhancement of the sentence fails, and, therefore, it is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial