Advanced Search Results
The State of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and ors.
Rajasthan
The State of Rajasthan
Mool Chand and ors.
Apr-16-1991
Criminal
1991(1)WLN410
V.S. Dave, J.1. The facts leading to these appeals & revision demonstrate as to how the criminal courts are used for working the vengeance and personal vendetta. The State as well as the complainant Bhagwat Prasad...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Mool Chand
Rajasthan
State
Mool Chand
Nov-07-1985
Criminal
1985WLN(UC)560
1. Heard learned Public Prosecutor. This is an appeal for the State for enhancement of the sentencement of the respondent Moolchand, who has been convicted under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and was sentenced...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Mool Chand
Allahabad
The State
Mool Chand
Jan-31-1957
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 16, 20 and 25(2); Uttar Pradesh Pure Food Act, 1950 - Sections 34
AIR1957All343; 1957CriLJ615
Raghubar Dayal, J.1. This is a State Appeal against the acquittal of Mool Chand of an offence under Section 16 read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (XXXVII of 1954) by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Mool Chand Wahi
Allahabad
State of Uttar Pradesh
Mool Chand Wahi
Mar-24-1972
Limitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 2, Rule 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19(1); Constitution of India - Article 166
AIR1972All413
Hari Swarup, J. 1. The defendant State of Uttar Pradesh has filed this appeal against the decree passed by the firstappellate court. The suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted by the plaintiff for recovery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and anr.
Supreme Court of India
State of Rajasthan
Mool Chand and anr.
Oct-14-2004
Criminal
Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 4, 17, 28 and 36; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1963 - Rule 59; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 14, 17 and 37
AIR2005SC112; 2004(8)SCALE770; (2004)12SCC483; 2005(1)LC215(SC)
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These two appeals involve identical issues and therefore are taken up for disposal together. The judgment impugned in Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2002 was based on the judgment which is the subject...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and ors.
Rajasthan
State of Rajasthan
Mool Chand and ors.
May-20-1983
Criminal
1984CriLJ794; 1983()WLN412
G.M. Lodha, J.1. As all the five appeals mentioned above are identical in nature and hence they are disposed of by one common judgment. The facts of Appeal No. 485/78 are given here as an illustrative...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›