Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: state · Respondent: mool chand · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.014 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 1991

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : The State of Rajasthan

Respondent : Mool Chand and ors.

Decided on : Apr-16-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN410

V.S. Dave, J.1. The facts leading to these appeals & revision demonstrate as to how the criminal courts are used for working the vengeance and personal vendetta. The State as well as the complainant Bhagwat Prasad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1985

State Vs. Mool Chand

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : State

Respondent : Mool Chand

Decided on : Nov-07-1985

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)560

1. Heard learned Public Prosecutor. This is an appeal for the State for enhancement of the sentencement of the respondent Moolchand, who has been convicted under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and was sentenced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1957

The State Vs. Mool Chand

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : The State

Respondent : Mool Chand

Decided on : Jan-31-1957

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 16, 20 and 25(2); Uttar Pradesh Pure Food Act, 1950 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1957All343; 1957CriLJ615

Raghubar Dayal, J.1. This is a State Appeal against the acquittal of Mool Chand of an offence under Section 16 read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (XXXVII of 1954) by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1972

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Mool Chand Wahi

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : State of Uttar Pradesh

Respondent : Mool Chand Wahi

Decided on : Mar-24-1972

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 2, Rule 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19(1); Constitution of India - Article 166

Reported in : AIR1972All413

Hari Swarup, J. 1. The defendant State of Uttar Pradesh has filed this appeal against the decree passed by the firstappellate court. The suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted by the plaintiff for recovery...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2004

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Rajasthan

Respondent : Mool Chand and anr.

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 4, 17, 28 and 36; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1963 - Rule 59; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 14, 17 and 37

Reported in : AIR2005SC112; 2004(8)SCALE770; (2004)12SCC483; 2005(1)LC215(SC)

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These two appeals involve identical issues and therefore are taken up for disposal together. The judgment impugned in Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2002 was based on the judgment which is the subject...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1983

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mool Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : State of Rajasthan

Respondent : Mool Chand and ors.

Decided on : May-20-1983

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ794; 1983()WLN412

G.M. Lodha, J.1. As all the five appeals mentioned above are identical in nature and hence they are disposed of by one common judgment. The facts of Appeal No. 485/78 are given here as an illustrative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial