Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mul Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan

Mul Chand vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided May 04, 1992
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/764007

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No. 539 of 1992
Subject
Criminal;Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 198S - Sections 8/18 and 8/21--No provision to take cognizance by magistrate--Held, cognizance deserve to be quashed.;There is no provision under which the Magistrate can take cgonizance of the offences or try the accused. Hence, cognizance taken by the Magistrate dese...

Key legal issue
Criminal;Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mul Chand

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1992(2)WLN30

Excerpt

narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 198s - sections 8/18 and 8/21--no provision to take cognizance by magistrate--held, cognizance deserve to be quashed.;there is no provision under which the magistrate can take cgonizance of the offences or try the accused. hence, cognizance taken by the magistrate deserves to be quashed.;petition dismissed. - mohini kapur, j.1. challan for offence under sections 8/18 and 8/21 of the ndps act was presented by the a.p.p. before m.j.m. sangod district kota. on this, the learned magistrate took cognizance on 6th april, 1992. the petitioner had been arrested on 9th january, 1992.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner has contanded that offences under the ndps act and triable by special court to be constituted by the government and a person who is a sessions judge or addl. sessions judge is alone is qualified for appointment. under section 36(d) of the ndps act, the offences committed under the ndps act prior to the constitution of the special court are to be tried by court of sessions judge. there is no provision under which the magistrate can take cognizance of the offences or try the accused. hence, cognizance taken by the magistrate deserves to be quashed. the petitioner shall be released. however, ho shall give a personal bond for rs.5000/- undertaking to remain at the address given by him, in the petition and that the will appear in the court in which he may be asked to appear in case chellan is filed before the proper court.

Full Judgment

Mohini Kapur, J.

1. Challan for offence under Sections 8/18 and 8/21 of the NDPS Act was presented by the A.P.P. before M.J.M. Sangod district Kota. On this, the learned Magistrate took cognizance on 6th April, 1992. The petitioner had been arrested on 9th January, 1992.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has contanded that offences under the NDPS Act and triable by Special Court to be constituted by the Government and a person who is a Sessions Judge or Addl. Sessions Judge is alone is qualified for appointment. Under Section 36(d) of the NDPS Act, the offences committed under the NDPS Act prior to the constitution of the Special Court are to be tried by court of Sessions Judge. There is no provision under which the Magistrate can take cognizance of the offences or try the accused. Hence, cognizance taken by the Magistrate deserves to be quashed. The petitioner shall be released. However, ho shall give a personal bond for Rs.5000/- undertaking to remain at the address given by him, in the petition and that the will appear in the court in which he may be asked to appear in case chellan is filed before the proper court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial