Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of Rajasthan Vs. Chhagan Lal

State of Rajasthan vs Chhagan Lal

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Oct 29, 1999
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/763582

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl. Leave to Appeal No. 218 of 1999
Subject
Family;Criminal
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 378--Penal Code, 1860--Sections 306. 498A--Appeal against acquittal--Leave to appeal--Offence under Sections 306, 498A, IPC--Accused and his deceased wife living together for 15 years and begetting three children--No complaint made by deceased wife of any ill treatment during ...

Key legal issue
Family;Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Rajasthan

Advocate R.K. Soni, P.P.

Respondent

Chhagan Lal

Advocate None

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A
Reported In
II(2000)DMC700; 2000(2)WLC191; 2000(2)WLN70

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 378--penal code, 1860--sections 306. 498a--appeal against acquittal--leave to appeal--offence under sections 306, 498a, ipc--accused and his deceased wife living together for 15 years and begetting three children--no complaint made by deceased wife of any ill treatment during this period--wife willing to live with his husband in gujarat while husband insisting on her stay at village for some more time--frustrated wife committing suicide by burning herself--trial court acquitting accused giving benefit of doubt--justified in the circumstances--leave to appeal against acquittal refused.;leave to appeal refused - b.j. shethna, j.1. learned public prosecutor mr. soni submitted that the learned trial judge committed an error in acquitting the accused-husband for the offence punishable under sections 306, 498a, i.p.c. he submitted that dying declaration of sayari wife of accused chhagan lal was sufficient to convict the accused.2. it is true that in her dying declaration, she had stated that since their marriage, her husband was continuously beating her and torturing her and telling that she had paramour, therefore, in the morning at about 6.30 a.m. she poured kerosene on her and burnt herself. however, this statement does not bear signature of the deceased. the reason given was that she was fully burnt and could not even put up her thumb impression. from that so-called dying declaration, it also appears that 15 years have passed after their marriage and out of their wedlock they got two sons and one daughter. if her husband was really torturing her right from the day one of their marriage then it would not have been possible. the learned judge was very much right in observing that if she was harassed and beaten for all these 15 years then she would have atleast informed somebody about this type of ill-treatment meted out to her by her husband. that apart, it has come on record that real dispute between the accused-husband and deceased wife was that wife wanted to go and stay with her husband, who was serving at gujarat, whereas, the husband wanted his wife to stay at village for sometime more. it is also clear that just a day before the incident accused chhagan lal came from gujarat and she insisted that she will go with him to gujarat, but the accused refused. this seems to be the real reason that in the early morning she committed suicide. if the accused had any other intention then he would not have immediately took his wife to the hospital and made an attempt to save her. the conduct of the accused was also natural.3. having regard to all these, if the learned judge.....

Full Judgment

B.J. Shethna, J.

1. Learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Soni submitted that the learned trial Judge committed an error in acquitting the accused-husband for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 498A, I.P.C. He submitted that dying declaration of Sayari wife of accused Chhagan LaL was sufficient to convict the accused.

2. It is true that in her dying declaration, she had stated that since their marriage, her husband was continuously beating her and torturing her and telling that she had paramour, therefore, in the morning at about 6.30 a.m. she poured kerosene on her and burnt herself. However, this statement does not bear signature of the deceased. The reason given was that she was fully burnt and could not even put up her thumb impression. From that so-called dying declaration, it also appears that 15 years have passed after their marriage and out of their wedlock they got two sons and one daughter. If her husband was really torturing her right from the day one of their marriage then it would not have been possible. The learned Judge was very much right in observing that if she was harassed and beaten for all these 15 years then she would have atleast informed somebody about this type of ill-treatment meted out to her by her husband. That apart, it has come on record that real dispute between the accused-husband and deceased wife was that wife wanted to go and stay with her husband, who was serving at Gujarat, whereas, the husband wanted his wife to stay at village for sometime more. It is also clear that just a day before the incident accused Chhagan Lal came from Gujarat and she insisted that she will go with him to Gujarat, but the accused refused. This seems to be the real reason that in the early morning she committed suicide. If the accused had any other intention then he would not have immediately took his wife to the hospital and made an attempt to save her. The conduct of the accused was also natural.

3. Having regard to all these, if the learned Judge thought it fit to give benefit of doubt to the accused then certainly this Court will not interfere with such order of acquittal.

4. In view of the above discussion, leave refused appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial