Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chhoti Devi (Smt.) Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Chhoti Devi (Smt.) vs State of Raj. and ors.

Disposition Petition allowed Court Rajasthan Decided May 09, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/761029

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6349 of 2003
Subject
Service
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Service
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chhoti Devi (Smt.)

Advocate R.K. Sharma, Adv.

Respondent

State of Raj. and ors.

Advocate H.V. Nandwana, Dy. G.A.

Legal References

Cases Referred
Smt. Prabhati Devi v. State of Raj. and Ors.
Reported In
RLW2005(4)Raj2212; 2005(2)WLC152

Excerpt

- .....denied to the petitioner.2. the death is always uncertain and unforeseen. since the husband of the petitioner has already filled in the option form prior to his death on 10.11.1982, it is irrelevant whether the same had been accepted by the concerning authorities in time or not. be that as it may, since the controversy under similar circumstances has already been decided by this court in the case of smt. prabhati devi v. state of raj. and ors., s.b. civil writ petition no. 5302/1999, decided on 22.10.2002, which has further been affirmed by the division bench of this court, in my opinion, the petitioner is also entitled for the relief, as claimed.3. accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. respondents are now directed to grant family pension to the petitioner as per relevant rules after adjusting the amount of cpf without charging any interest on the cpf. since no valid justification has been given by the respondents in not giving the benefit to the petitioner, an interest @ 10% may also be paid to the petitioner on the amount due from the date of death of the petitioner till the same is paid. the amount has unnecessarily been withheld for the last more than 22 years. in the interest of justice, i also deem it proper to direct the respondents to pay a cost of rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner alongwith the arrears, referred above. the entire payment be made within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Full Judgment

Ashok Parihar, J.

1. Husband of the petitioner died while in service working as Beldar. Though CPF amount has been paid to the petitioner, however, family pension has not been paid so far. Initially it has been submitted that the husband of the petitioner did not submit any option for pension. However, it reveals that though the option form has duly been submitted by the husband of the petitioner during his life time, however, as per contention raised by the respondents, the same had not been accepted by the concerning authorities prior to his death. It was only on this ground the family pension has been denied to the petitioner.

2. The death is always uncertain and unforeseen. Since the husband of the petitioner has already filled in the option form prior to his death on 10.11.1982, it is irrelevant whether the same had been accepted by the concerning authorities in time or not. Be that as it may, since the controversy under similar circumstances has already been decided by this Court in the case of Smt. Prabhati Devi v. State of Raj. and Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5302/1999, decided on 22.10.2002, which has further been affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court, in my opinion, the petitioner is also entitled for the relief, as claimed.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Respondents are now directed to grant family pension to the petitioner as per relevant rules after adjusting the amount of CPF without charging any interest on the CPF. Since no valid justification has been given by the respondents In not giving the benefit to the petitioner, an interest @ 10% may also be paid to the petitioner on the amount due from the date of death of the petitioner till the same is paid. The amount has unnecessarily been withheld for the last more than 22 years. In the interest of justice, I also deem it proper to direct the respondents to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner alongwith the arrears, referred above. The entire payment be made within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial