Sanjay C. Patel and ors. Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and anr.

Sanjay C. Patel and ors. vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Gujarat Decided Dec 29, 2008

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/748421

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/748421
Court: Gujarat High Court
Judge: S.R. Brahmbhatt, J.
Decided On: Dec 29, 2008
Case Number: Special Civil Application Nos. 14161, 14163 to 14168 and 17181 of 2007
Subject: Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Service
Acts & sections: The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(1); Railway (Conduct) Service Rules - Rule 3(1); All India Services (Discipline And Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 7;...

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay C. Patel and ors.

Advocate T.R. Mishra, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 to 7

Respondent

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and anr.

Advocate Rule Served by D.S. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and; Lilu K. Bhaya, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Legal References

Acts: The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(1); Railway (Conduct) Service Rules - Rule 3(1); All India Services (Discipline And Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 7; Gujarat Elecricy Board Establishment Manual and Service Regulations - Regulation 26; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 311
Reported In: (2009)1GLR664

Excerpt

- order dated 29-12-2008:the request for staying the order has been made on behalf of the respondents. this request is strongly objected by the counsel for the workmen, as despite there was repeated orders passed by various authorities on various occasions, the respondents-employer has not paid any heed to hold the inquiry. in view of this, the request for staying the order cannot be granted. hence, it is rejected.

Full Judgment

ORDER

DATED 29-12-2008:

The request for staying the order has been made on behalf of the respondents. This request is strongly objected by the Counsel for the workmen, as despite there was repeated orders passed by various authorities on various occasions, the respondents-employer has not paid any heed to hold the inquiry. In view of this, the request for staying the order cannot be granted. Hence, it is rejected.

Same Court & Year Gujarat · 2008 Same Parties Sanjay C. Patel and ors. vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and... Same Subject Service Same Judge S.R. Brahmbhatt, J. Acts & Sections The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Se...

Service