Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Unitac Industries

Collector of Central Excise vs Unitac Industries

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 18, 1994
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/7400

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Central Excise

Respondent

Unitac Industries

Legal References

Reported In
(1994)(71)ELT836TriDel

Excerpt

....."cloth based self-adhesive tapes" for industrial use is classifiable under chapter sub-heading 5909.00 as claimed by the party or under sub-heading 5906.90 as contended by the department.4. it was submitted by the party in their cross-objection that this issue has been finally decided by the tribunal in their own case for a different period as per order no. e/150/93-d, dated 21-4-1993 [1994 (70) e.l.t. 141 (tri.)] wherein contention of the party was accepted holding that product in question is classifiable under sub-heading 5909.00. it was submitted that no further appeal has been filed by the department against the said order. it was also pointed out therein that the impugned order in this case was passed by the collector (appeals) following the ratio of the decision of the aforesaid case as per order no. e/150/93-d, dated 21-4-1993.5. since the issue has already been considered by the tribunal in the very party's case, learned departmental representative preferred to reiterate the stand taken by the department.6. we have considered the matter. since the issue has already been considered in the very party's case as pointed out by both sides, we are not inclined to take a different view on this issue. following the ratio of the precedent we hold that item in question is classifiable under chapter heading 59.09 of the central excise tariff act, 1985 and, accordingly, the appeal filed by the department is hereby dismissed.cross-objections are also disposed of accordingly.7. the operative portion of this order was already pronounced in the open court on the conclusion of the hearing on 7-3-1994.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal filed by the Department against the impugned order dated 16-7-1993 passed by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore.

2. When the matter had come up for final hearing none appeared for the respondents but we find that there was a request from them to decide the case on merits based on their cross-objection.

3. The point to be considered in this case is whether "Cloth based self-adhesive tapes" for industrial use is classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 5909.00 as claimed by the party or under sub-heading 5906.90 as contended by the Department.

4. It was submitted by the party in their Cross-Objection that this issue has been finally decided by the Tribunal in their own case for a different period as per Order No. E/150/93-D, dated 21-4-1993 [1994 (70) E.L.T. 141 (Tri.)] wherein contention of the party was accepted holding that product in question is classifiable under sub-heading 5909.00. It was submitted that no further appeal has been filed by the Department against the said order. It was also pointed out therein that the impugned order in this case was passed by the Collector (Appeals) following the ratio of the decision of the aforesaid case as per Order No. E/150/93-D, dated 21-4-1993.

5. Since the issue has already been considered by the Tribunal in the very party's case, learned Departmental Representative preferred to reiterate the stand taken by the Department.

6. We have considered the matter. Since the issue has already been considered in the very party's case as pointed out by both sides, we are not inclined to take a different view on this issue. Following the ratio of the precedent we hold that item in question is classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.09 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and, accordingly, the appeal filed by the Department is hereby dismissed.

Cross-Objections are also disposed of accordingly.

7. The operative portion of this order was already pronounced in the open Court on the conclusion of the hearing on 7-3-1994.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial