Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Widow of Devendra Ratilal Pathak Vs. State of Gujarat

Widow of Devendra Ratilal Pathak vs State of Gujarat

Type Court Judgment Court Gujarat Decided Sep 08, 1986
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/738929

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Gujarat High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - The mother and the son wander like beggars seeking alms to obtain Rs. Pleader, on 5-9-1986. We are happy that the amount of the insurance scheme payable to the widow has been paid atleast now. We observe that it would have been better if the authorities concerned had taken prompt action in disbursing the lawfu...

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Widow of Devendra Ratilal Pathak

Respondent

State of Gujarat

Legal References

Reported In
(1987)2GLR759

Excerpt

- - the mother and the son wander like beggars seeking alms to obtain rs. pleader, on 5-9-1986. we are happy that the amount of the insurance scheme payable to the widow has been paid atleast now. we observe that it would have been better if the authorities concerned had taken prompt action in disbursing the lawful dues payable to the unfortunate people......to number the petition and after numbering, we issued notice to the addl. government pleader asking him to look into the matter and report. mr. g.d bhatt, learned govt. pleader took time on 29-8-1986 for the purpose of getting particulars regarding this matter. today, he makes a statement before this court on instructions that the widow of the police constable devendra ratilal pathajc has got the provident fund amount of rs. 22,650/- on 17-5-1985.3. it is further stated by mr. g.d. bhatt, the learned govt. pleader that the government has since paid the state government employees insurance scheme amount, amounting to rs. 22,282/- to the widow of devendra ratilal pathak. this was paid, according to the learned govt. pleader, on 5-9-1986. we are happy that the amount of the insurance scheme payable to the widow has been paid atleast now. letter written by dy. superintendent of police, c.i.d. and addressed to the asstt. government pleader is taken on record. we observe that it would have been better if the authorities concerned had taken prompt action in disbursing the lawful dues payable to the unfortunate people. this special civil application is disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, C.J.

1. This matter was taken on file on a letter addressed to the Chief Justice by an Advocate whose name has not been mentioned. He has enclosed a paper cutting. This paper cutting is from a daily 'Sandesh' dated 15-8-1986 which reads as under:

Devendra Ratital Pathak, a Police Constable at Bharuch died suddenly at the young age of 46 years in a short sickness on 10-10-83.

The plight of the widow of the deceased and her only son has become as if they are 'dead though alive' after the deceased's death. The mother and the son wander like beggars seeking alms to obtain Rs. 20,252/- of the G.P. Fund of the deceased as per the new scheme. Both of them plead for mercy at different places, Bharuch, Surat, Ahmedabad wherever they are told to make an approach, but nobody passes their BNO. 33/86-87 and the widow does not get the money.

When the Home Department is unable to get the money paid to its own employee, the Police Constable, what else could the Home Department (be expected to) do? Perhaps the placards 'May I help you' are only meant for decorative purposes. Or, whether 'paper weight' is expected from the widow of their own co-employee by the 'Khakhi gang' to prevent the papers scattering away?

2. On this, the Officer was directed to number the petition and after numbering, we issued notice to the Addl. Government Pleader asking him to look into the matter and report. Mr. G.D Bhatt, learned Govt. Pleader took time on 29-8-1986 for the purpose of getting particulars regarding this matter. Today, he makes a statement before this Court on instructions that the widow of the Police Constable Devendra Ratilal Pathajc has got the Provident Fund amount of Rs. 22,650/- on 17-5-1985.

3. It is further stated by Mr. G.D. Bhatt, the learned Govt. Pleader that the Government has since paid the State Government Employees Insurance Scheme amount, amounting to Rs. 22,282/- to the widow of Devendra Ratilal Pathak. This was paid, according to the learned Govt. Pleader, on 5-9-1986. We are happy that the amount of the insurance scheme payable to the widow has been paid atleast now. Letter written by Dy. Superintendent of Police, C.I.D. and addressed to the Asstt. Government Pleader is taken on record. We observe that it would have been better if the authorities concerned had taken prompt action in disbursing the lawful dues payable to the unfortunate people. This Special Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial