Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy Paul Vs. Sibi Mathew

Joy Paul vs Sibi Mathew

Disposition Petition allowed Court Kerala Decided Jun 09, 2003
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/727974

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
O.P. No. 7135 of 2003
Subject
Election
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LABOUR & SERVICES Appointment: [V.K. Bali, CH, P.R. Raman & S. Siri Jagan, JJ] Post of Pharmacist in Homeopathy Subordinate Service - Special Rules for Kerala Homeopathy Subordinate Service Rules, 1999 introducing new qualifications Vacancy arising subsequent to coming into force of the said special rules Hel...

Key legal issue
Election
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 88

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy Paul

Advocate K.K. Chandran Pillai and; J. Vidyalakshmi, Advs.

Respondent

Sibi Mathew

Advocate M.C. Cherian,; Asha Cherian,; E.D. George,;

Legal References

Acts
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 88
Reported In
2003(3)KLT343

Excerpt

- labour & services appointment: [v.k. bali, ch, p.r. raman & s. siri jagan, jj] post of pharmacist in homeopathy subordinate service - special rules for kerala homeopathy subordinate service rules, 1999 introducing new qualifications vacancy arising subsequent to coming into force of the said special rules held, vacancies have to be filled up only in accordance with special rules, 1999. unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications prescribed by special rules. state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without retrospective effect. mohanan k.r. & anr vs director of homeopathy, kerala homeopathy services, trivandrum & ors. - in view of the provisions contained in section 88 of the panchayat raj act, to confer jurisdiction over a munsiffs court to try an election dispute, two conditions must be satisfied viz......does not contain the munsiffs court, kolencherry at all and hence that court cannot try any election petition. the district judge has also not considered whether the provisions contained in section 24 of the civil procedure code can have any application to an election dispute. the procedure adopted by the learned district judge is also not legal and proper. since the request was for transfer of an election petition the learned district judge ought to have treated the request as an original petition and issued notice to all parties to that o.p. it is not disputed by the respondents also that no notice was issued to parties before ordering the transfer. so the order under challenge was passed without notice. so the order passed by the learned district judge transferring the election o.p. from munsiff court, moovattupuzha to munsiff court, kolencherry is without jurisdiction and the same is liable to be quashed.in the result, the original petition is allowed. the order passed by the learned district judge transferring election o.p.no. 10/2000 from the files of munsiff court, moovattupuzha to munsiff court, kolenchery is hereby quashed. munsiff court, kolenchery is directed to re-transfer election o.p.no. 10/2000 to munsiff court, moovattupuzha. it is clarified that this order will not be a bar for the learned district judge to treat the request of the munsiff as an o.p. for transfer and pass fresh orders with due notice to all parties or to pass other appropriate orders in accordance with law. communicate a copy of the order to the learned district judge forthwith.

Full Judgment

K. Padmanabhan Nair, J.

1. The 1st respondent herein filed Election O.P.No. 10/2000, before the Munsiff's Court, Moovattupuzha, which is the designated Court for trial of the election disputearising from Kavilangadu Grama Panchayat challenging the result of the election by which the petitioner in this Original Petition was declared elected. After the trial has started, the learned Munsiff wrote a letter to the District Judge for transfer of the case from Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to any other court in Ernakulam District. The learned District Judge without hearing the parties transferred the election petition on the administrative side from the file of Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to Munsiff Court, Kolenchery. That order is under challenge in this O.P.

2. Section 88 of the Panchayat Raj Act deals with the Courts which are competent to trial election petitions.

Section 88. Court competent to try election petitions. The Court having jurisdiction to try an election petition shall be:-

(a) in the case of a Village Panchayat, the Munsiffs Court having jurisdiction over the place in which the headquarters of the Panchayat is located; and

(b) .......................

(2) The Government shall, in consultation with the High Court notify the appropriate Courts in the Gazette.

3. The Government had issued Ext. P1 notification conferring power on the Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to try election dispute arising from Kavilangadu Grama Panchayat. There is no provision in the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act for transferring an Election Petition pending before one designated court to another court.

4. Learned District Judge without considering the provisions contained in Section 88 of the Panchayat Raj Act transferred the Election Petition from the Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to Munsiff Court, Kolanchery. In view of the provisions contained in Section 88 of the Panchayat Raj Act, to confer jurisdiction over a Munsiffs Court to try an election dispute, two conditions must be satisfied viz.:

(1) The Munsiff Court must be having jurisdiction over the place in which the Head Quarters of the Panchayat is located.

(2) The Government must have issued the notification as contemplated under Section 88(2) of the Panchayat Raj Act.

5. The learned District Judge has not considered whether the Munsiff Court, Kolencherry is having jurisdiction over the place in which the Head Quarters of the Kavilangad Grama Panchayat is situated. It has also not considered whether the Government had issued any notification conferring power on the Munsiff Court, Kolencherry to try an election dispute arising from Kavilangad Grama Panchayat. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has pointed out that Ext. P1 notification does not contain the Munsiffs Court, Kolencherry at all and hence that Court cannot try any Election Petition. The District Judge has also not considered whether the provisions contained in Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code can have any application to an election dispute. The procedure adopted by the learned District Judge is also not legal and proper. Since the request was for transfer of an election petition the learned District Judge ought to have treated the request as an Original Petition and issued notice to all parties to that O.P. It is not disputed by the respondents also that no notice was issued to parties before ordering the transfer. So the order under challenge was passed without notice. So the order passed by the learned District Judge transferring the Election O.P. from Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to Munsiff Court, Kolencherry is without jurisdiction and the same is liable to be quashed.

In the result, the Original Petition is allowed. The order passed by the learned District Judge transferring Election O.P.No. 10/2000 from the files of Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha to Munsiff Court, Kolenchery is hereby quashed. Munsiff Court, Kolenchery is directed to re-transfer Election O.P.No. 10/2000 to Munsiff Court, Moovattupuzha. It is clarified that this order will not be a bar for the learned District Judge to treat the request of the Munsiff as an O.P. for transfer and pass fresh orders with due notice to all parties or to pass other appropriate orders in accordance with law. Communicate a copy of the order to the learned District Judge forthwith.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial