Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sr. Jyothis Vs. State of Kerala

Sr. Jyothis vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 12, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/724786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
O.P. No. 3334 of 1995 etc.
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT, 1951[C.A. No. 63/1951. Sections 29 & 31: [K.S. Radhakrishnan, Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan & M.N. Krishnan, JJ] Recovery of loan amount Held, Once industrial concern commits default in repayment of the loan or advance made by the Financial Corporation and under a liability, the rig...

Key legal issue
Property
Acts & sections
Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 - Sections 4 and 5

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sr. Jyothis

Advocate Siby Mathew,; A.A. Mohammed Nazir and; Philip J. Vettick

Respondent

State of Kerala

Advocate P. Jayashanker, Government Pleader

Legal References

Acts
Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 - Sections 4 and 5
Reported In
2003(2)KLT612; (2003)IIILLJ915Ker

Excerpt

- state financial corporation act, 1951[c.a. no. 63/1951. sections 29 & 31: [k.s. radhakrishnan, thottathil b. radhakrishnan & m.n. krishnan, jj] recovery of loan amount held, once industrial concern commits default in repayment of the loan or advance made by the financial corporation and under a liability, the right of the corporation to invoke section 29 of the act accrues and it is open to the corporation to realise the entire loan advanced to the industrial concern not only from the properties of the industrial concern but also from the properties pledged or mortgaged b y the sureties for the loan advanced by the corporation. section 29 is a complete code by itself. liability of principal-debtor and surety is always joint and co-extensive. [n. narasimhaiah v karnataka state financial corporation, air 2004 kar 46 dissented from].s. sankarasubban, j.1. these original petitions have come up before us on a reference made by koshy, j. the question that is referred to, is whether the doctors' consulting rooms, dispensaries attached to doctors' consulting rooms, nursing homes, hospitals and other institutions for treatment of the sick can be roped into the kerala shops and commercial establishments act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as the 'act'. these establishments were being exempted for a long time. in 1993, notification was issued taking away the exemption and bringing it within the act. subsequently, it is found that certain provisions of the act were exempted in their applications to the above institutions. it is in the above circumstances, the original petitions were filed. interim orders have been granted to the petitioners staying the operation and enforcement of the notifications. 2. learned counsel for the petitioners brought to our notice a notification g.o. (rt.) no. 2019/2002/lbr dt. 12th july, 2002, issued under section 5 of the kerala shops and commercial establishments act, 1960, in the public interest, exempting the above institutions. the exemption is for a period of two years. thus, from 12.7.2002 these institutions are exempted. in the wake of the above institution, as at present there is no injury or grievance for the petitioners. in the above circumstances we are not answering the questions referred to. we leave the questions to be agitated by the petitioners when occasion arises. with the above directions the o.ps. are disposed of.

Full Judgment

S. Sankarasubban, J.

1. These Original Petitions have come up before us on a reference made by Koshy, J. The question that is referred to, is whether the Doctors' consulting rooms, Dispensaries attached to Doctors' Consulting rooms, Nursing homes, Hospitals and other institutions for treatment of the sick can be roped into the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'. These establishments were being exempted for a long time. In 1993, notification was issued taking away the exemption and bringing it within the Act. Subsequently, it is found that certain provisions of the Act were exempted in their applications to the above institutions. It is in the above circumstances, the original petitions were filed. Interim orders have been granted to the petitioners staying the operation and enforcement of the notifications.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners brought to our notice a notification G.O. (Rt.) No. 2019/2002/LBR dt. 12th July, 2002, issued under Section 5 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, in the public interest, exempting the above institutions. The exemption is for a period of two years. Thus, from 12.7.2002 these institutions are exempted. In the wake of the above institution, as at present there is no injury or grievance for the petitioners. In the above circumstances we are not answering the questions referred to. We leave the questions to be agitated by the petitioners when occasion arises.

With the above directions the O.Ps. are disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial