Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Monica Sharma Vs. State

Monica Sharma vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 30, 2003
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/704471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl. M.(M) No. 3369 of 2003
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439--Bail to accused under Section 498-A and 302 of IPC--Allegation of death caused by burning of bride--Accused in custody for two years--Accused being married sister-in-Law of deceased with all other family members already in custody--Interim bail for three months granted. -...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 498A

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Monica Sharma

Advocate Siddharth Luthra, Adv

Respondent

State

Advocate Pawan Sharma, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 498A
Reported In
108(2003)DLT572; I(2004)DMC11; 2004(73)DRJ391

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 439--bail to accused under section 498-a and 302 of ipc--allegation of death caused by burning of bride--accused in custody for two years--accused being married sister-in-law of deceased with all other family members already in custody--interim bail for three months granted. - - 15,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to the condition that she shall not visit the area of shahdara;.....of milk. learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last 2 years; out of the 25 witnesses cited by the prosecution, only 2-3 witnesses have so far been examined, and thereforee, the trial would take a long time. learned counsel submits that the petitioner is the married sister-in-law of the deceased and she was living separately with her two minor children; all other family members of petitioner are in custody, thereforee, at least she be granted bail or interim bail to look-after her family.4. learned app for the state submits that the matter is now listed on 13th to 15th november, 2003 and, thereforee, the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail and the bail of petitioner is already dismissed on merits and there is no change in the circumstances.5. looking to the age of the petitioner, the fact that she is married and having two minor children and the fact that all other members of her parents' family are in custody, she is ordered to be released on interim bail for a period of three months, on her furnishing personal bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to the condition that she shall not visit the area of shahdara; shall not leave delhi, without prior permission of the trial court and shall not tamper with the evidence.petition stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

S.K. Agarwal, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 439 read with Section 482, Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 313/2002, under Sections 498A, 302, 34, IPC, P.S. Shahdara, Delhi.

2. Petitioner's first application for bail was declined vide detail order dated 21.8.2002 passed by this Court. Learned Counsel submits that there is a change in the circumstances during the last one year inasmuch as Chemical examination report has now been received. It is submitted that as per the CFSL report, the Exhibits 1 and 2 on the analysis (one cream coloured brassier and one light blue coloured cloth piece of suit Ex. 2 scalp hair of the deceased) did not give any positive test of kerosene oil.

3. Learned Counsel argued that CFSL report belies the statement of the younger sister, Kumari Neeta who claims to be an eye-witness of the occurrence; that this report also belies the second dying declaration before the SDM and supports the earlier dying declaration to the effect that she had received burn injuries because of the boiling of milk. Learned Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last 2 years; out of the 25 witnesses cited by the prosecution, only 2-3 witnesses have so far been examined, and thereforee, the trial would take a long time. Learned Counsel submits that the petitioner is the married sister-in-law of the deceased and she was living separately with her two minor children; all other family members of petitioner are in custody, thereforee, at least she be granted bail or interim bail to look-after her family.

4. Learned APP for the State submits that the matter is now listed on 13th to 15th November, 2003 and, thereforee, the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail and the bail of petitioner is already dismissed on merits and there is no change in the circumstances.

5. Looking to the age of the petitioner, the fact that she is married and having two minor children and the fact that all other members of her parents' family are in custody, she is ordered to be released on interim bail for a period of three months, on her furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the condition that she shall not visit the area of Shahdara; shall not leave Delhi, without prior permission of the Trial Court and shall not tamper with the evidence.

Petition stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial