Advanced Search Results

Vasu Tech Limited and ors. Vs. Ratna Commercial Enterprises Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 139, 141 and 141(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 202 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT591

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.,; Sanjiv Bahl,; Ajay Shekhar

Aruna Suresh, J.1. By way of this common order I shall deal with five petitions seeking quashing of Complaint Cases; Nos. 1745/1 of 2007, 1748/1 of 2007, 1751/1 of 2007, 1747/1 of 2007 and 1746/1 of...

Zal Balsara Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 29(1) and 33; Prevision of Food Adulteration Act; Evidence Act - Sections 106; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 319 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 561A

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ65

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.,; Ankit Goyal and; Rajni Gupta

ORDERS. Muralidhar, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('CrPC') filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of the Complaint Case No. 136/1997 titled Plant Protection Officer/Licensing Officer v....

Uday Pratap Singh Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

Global Steel Philippines Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Global Steel Holdings L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

State Vs. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Varun Goswami, Mr. Anindya Malhotra

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2015 Date of Decision:16. h April, 2015 % + CRL. A. 358/2014 STATE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with...

Vijay and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406 and 498A

Reported in : I(2008)DMC875; 2008(102)DRJ294

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. and; Shri Singh, Adv

S. Muralidhar, J.1. These petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('CrPC') seek the quashing of FIR No. 177 of 2004 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Jaffarpur Kalan pending...

M/S. Laxmi Cable Co. and anr. Vs the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. ; Mr. K.S. Negi, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?(No)2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?(No)3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?(No) ORDER.1.The petitioners having failed in the...

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. C.B.I.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Vivek Suri

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C.NO.531/2015 SANJEEV NANDA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Vivek Suri &...

Azimusshan Haider Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(3), 6, 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 6, 8, 14, 19 and 226

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT659; 2008(104)DRJ604

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.,; Anurag Ahluwalia and; Abhijeet

T.S. Thakur, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the constitutional validity of Section 14(1) of the Citizenship Act and prays for a declaration to the effect that...