Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bottling Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Bottling Co. Ltd. vs Collector of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 19, 1993
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/7032

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bottling Co. Ltd.

Respondent

Collector of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(1996)(81)ELT226TriDel

Excerpt

2. the issue involved in this case is regarding the admissibility of modivation glass bottle for aerated waters, which were not received in their original packing as the same were received by the aerated water manufacturing after printing of the brand name.3. it was submitted by the learned advocate that the board had issued a circular dated 3-9-1992 clarifying that the modvat credit should not be denied on the above ground.5. considered. the issue involved is covered by the board's circular (supra). both the orders of lower authorities were passed prior to the issue of said circular, in the interest of justice the matter is remanded to the assistant collector for de novo consideration inter alia in the light of the said circular after following the principles of natural justice after considering gate passes and other documents that may be produced.

Full Judgment

2. The issue involved in this case is regarding the admissibility of Modivation glass bottle for aerated waters, which were not received in their original packing as the same were received by the Aerated Water manufacturing after printing of the brand name.

3. It was submitted by the learned Advocate that the Board had issued a Circular dated 3-9-1992 clarifying that the Modvat credit should not be denied on the above ground.

5. Considered. The issue involved is covered by the Board's Circular (supra). Both the orders of lower authorities were passed prior to the issue of said circular, in the interest of justice the matter is remanded to the Assistant Collector for de novo consideration inter alia in the light of the said circular after following the principles of natural justice after considering gate passes and other documents that may be produced.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial