Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bijay Singh Vs. Union of India

Bijay Singh vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 19, 1993
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/696443

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Regular First Appeal No. 128 of 1984
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

LAND ACQUISITION ACT 1894 - Section 23-market value of land situated in village Jasola-Notification Under Section 4 & 6 dated 31-12-1976-village Jasola adjacent to village Bahpur-market value fixed at Rs. 55000/- P.B. - - Still not satisfied, the appellants have filed this appeal.

Key legal issue
Property
Acts & sections
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bijay Singh

Advocate Atul Kumar, Adv

Respondent

Union of India

Legal References

Acts
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23
Reported In
52(1993)DLT15; 1993(27)DRJ17

Excerpt

land acquisition act 1894 - section 23-market value of land situated in village jasola-notification under section 4 & 6 dated 31-12-1976-village jasola adjacent to village bahpur-market value fixed at rs. 55000/- p.b. - - still not satisfied, the appellants have filed this appeal......counsel for the appellants, has referred to a decision of this court in rfa 51/83 entitled union of india v. nand kishore wherein a bench of this court, by judgment dated 6th march 1984, upheld the fixation of market price of the land in village bahapur at rs.55,000.00 per bigha. this value had been arrived at by the additional district judge on a reference made to him under section 18 of the act. wemay, however, note that inthiscase,the notification under section 4of the act was of the year 1972. in the present case, as noted above, the notification under section 4 of the act is of the year 1976. it is not our opinion that same value is to be arrived at in this case just because two villages are adjacent to each other but there is a difference of four years in issue of notification in the present case and that in rfa 51 /83. (4) we had heard this matter on 12th july 1993 and again today. there has been no appearance on behalf of respondent/union of india to oppose this appeal. (5) keeping in view the decision of this court in rfa 51/83, we are of the opinion that the market value of the land in village jasola, village adjacent to that of village bahapur, in the present case should be fixed at rs.55,000.00 per bigha. we order accordingly. (6) the appeal is allowed. the market value of the land in question is fixed at rs.55,000.00 per bigha. there will bean enhancement of rs.45,000.00 per bigha on the value as fixed by the additional district judge. the appellant will be entitled to interest and solarium as per section 23-b and section 28 of the act. the decree will be drawn up after the deficiency in court fee is made. the court fee may be paid within a period of four weeks. the appellants will be entitled to costs limited to court fees only.

Full Judgment

D.P. Wadhwa, J.

(1) This appeal filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the Act) is directed against the judgment dated 27thJanuary 1984of the Additional District Judge in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Act. The land in question is situated in Village Jasola. Notification under Section 4 and declaration under Section 6 of the Act were both issued on 31st December 1976. The Land Acquisition Collector made his award on 2nd February 1979 fixing the market value of the land at Rs.7.060.00 per bigha. On a reference under section 18 of the Act, the learned Additional District Judge fixed the market value of the land at Rs. 10.000.00 per bigha. Still not satisfied, the appellants have filed this appeal.

(2) When the appeal was originally filed, it was stated that the market value of the land was Rs.30,000.00 per bigha. However, during the pendency of the appeal, the appellants have sought amendment of the memo of appeal now claiming Rs.55,000.00 per bigha as the market value of the land. This is by an application (C.M. 108/92). We had issued notice of this application but there has not been any response to the same. The application, thereforee, is allowed.

(3) MR.ATUI Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants, has referred to a decision of this Court in Rfa 51/83 entitled union of India v. Nand Kishore wherein a bench of this Court, by judgment dated 6th March 1984, upheld the fixation of market price of the land in Village Bahapur at Rs.55,000.00 per bigha. This value had been arrived at by the Additional District Judge on a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Act. Wemay, however, note that inthiscase,the notification under Section 4of the Act was of the year 1972. In the present case, as noted above, the notification under Section 4 of the Act is of the year 1976. It is not our opinion that same value is to be arrived at in this case just because two villages are adjacent to each other but there is a difference of four years in issue of notification in the present case and that in Rfa 51 /83.

(4) We had heard this matter on 12th July 1993 and again today. There has been no appearance on behalf of respondent/Union of India to oppose this appeal.

(5) Keeping in view the decision of this Court in Rfa 51/83, we are of the opinion that the market value of the land in Village Jasola, village adjacent to that of Village Bahapur, in the present case should be fixed at Rs.55,000.00 per bigha. We order accordingly.

(6) The appeal is allowed. The market value of the land in question is fixed at Rs.55,000.00 per bigha. There will bean enhancement of Rs.45,000.00 per bigha on the value as fixed by the Additional District Judge. The appellant will be entitled to interest and solarium as per Section 23-B and Section 28 of the Act. The decree will be drawn up after the deficiency in court fee is made. The court fee may be paid within a period of four weeks. The appellants will be entitled to costs limited to court fees only.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial