Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajiv Agarwal Vs. Union of India

Rajiv Agarwal vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 02, 1993
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/695347

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Writ Appeal No. 1332 of 1992
Subject
Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

It was ruled that under Section 7 and 7-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the presiding officer of the Labour Court and the Industrial Tribunal, should be from the Delhi higher judicial services and not from the Delhi judicial services - Accordingly, directions were given for the same - - (1) On a considerat...

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial
Acts & sections
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajiv Agarwal

Advocate Ashok Aggarwal,; Madan Lokur and; S.K. Mahajan, Advs

Respondent

Union of India

Legal References

Acts
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7
Reported In
1993IVAD(Delhi)826; 1994(28)DRJ159

Excerpt

it was ruled that under section 7 and 7-a of the industrial disputes act, 1947, the presiding officer of the labour court and the industrial tribunal, should be from the delhi higher judicial services and not from the delhi judicial services - accordingly, directions were given for the same - - (1) on a consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the reference made to the industrial tribunal or the labour courts constituted under the provision of industrial disputes act, 1947, should be dealt with the members of the delhi higher judicial services and not by the members of the delhi judicial service as we are aware that in most of the states of the country, such like tribunals are being manned by the members of the higher judicial service.dalveer bhandari, j.(1) on a consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the reference made to the industrial tribunal or the labour courts constituted under the provision of industrial disputes act, 1947, should be dealt with the members of the delhi higher judicial services and not by the members of the delhi judicial service as we are aware that in most of the states of the country, such like tribunals are being manned by the members of the higher judicial service.(2) a similar matter relating to the constitution of motor accident claims tribunals in delhi came up before the court in c.w. 2887/91 hi lawyers forum for civil liberties v. union of india and by order dated 4.12.1991, this court issued a direction to the govern- ment of india that the motor accident claims in delhi should be manned by the members of delhi higher judicial service. that order was carried out by union of india.(3) in this case we have been waiting for the union of india to make the order itself but despite several opportunities nothing has been done and we are contained to order that the respondent should make changes in the rules, if necessary, and make provision for the decided of the references made by the government whether to the industrial tribunal or the labour courts that such references should be decided by the members of delhi higher judicial service. as and when information is furnished to the number of officers required for this purpose, this court will make available members of the delhi higher judicial service to man those . tribunals. in this behalf, the respondent should take immediate steps and as far as possible, the decision should be taken up within two months from today.(4) with this order and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of

Full Judgment

Dalveer Bhandari, J.

(1) On a consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the reference made to the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Courts constituted under the provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, should be dealt with the members of the Delhi Higher Judicial Services and not by the members of the Delhi Judicial Service as we are aware that in most of the States of the country, such like tribunals are being manned by the members of the Higher Judicial Service.

(2) A similar matter relating to the constitution of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in Delhi came up before the court in C.W. 2887/91 Hi Lawyers Forum for civil liberties v. Union of India and by order dated 4.12.1991, this court issued a direction to the Govern- ment of India that the Motor accident claims in Delhi should be manned by the members of Delhi Higher Judicial Service. That order was carried out by Union of India.

(3) In this case we have been waiting for the Union of India to make the order itself but despite several opportunities nothing has been done and we are contained to order that the respondent should make changes in the rules, if necessary, and make provision for the decided of the references made by the Government whether to the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Courts that such references should be decided by the members of Delhi Higher Judicial Service. As and when information is furnished to the number of officers required for this purpose, this court will make available members of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service to man those . Tribunals. In this behalf, the respondent should take immediate steps and as far as possible, the decision should be taken up within two months from today.

(4) With this order and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial