Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr. Raja Ram and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Mr. Raja Ram and Another vs Union of India and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 15, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/683783

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
L.P.A. 110/80
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case dealt with validity in reduction of compensation under Section 23(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in relevance to reference - The court had awarded Rs. 14,000/- per bhiga and the first appeal was made by the union of India - In following the bhagimal's case court reduction of compensation, the LPA was...

Key legal issue
Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Raja Ram and Another

Respondent

Union of India and Others

Legal References

Reported In
2001IIIAD(Delhi)18; 90(2001)DLT420

Excerpt

the case dealt with validity in reduction of compensation under section 23(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894, in relevance to reference - the court had awarded rs. 14,000/- per bhiga and the first appeal was made by the union of india - in following the bhagimal's case court reduction of compensation, the lpa was claimed for enhancement, however the same was quashed - it was found that appellant was ready in receiving the negligible differential amount - hence it was ruled that compensation awarded by the reference court was to be affirmed - orderkhan, j.1. appellants land measuring 500 square yards was acquired in village shakurpur pursuant to section 4 notification dated 24.10.1961. reference court awarded them compensation at the rate of rs.14,000/- per bigha by relying upon a sale deed ext. -a2 dated 9.11.1959. this made a difference of only rs.2,375/- to each claimant as against the award of the collector.2. all the same respondent filed an appeal against this (rfa no.225/70) which was disposed off by first appellate court in terms of bhagmal's case which in turn was disposed off in terms of ram mehr's case (rfa no. 409/71) awarding general compensation of rs.8,000/- per bigha of land in shakurpur village, and having the consequence the reducing the compensation in the present case to few thousands of rupees.3. appellants feel aggrieved of this and have filed this appeal. we have already decided a connected appeal (lpa no.256/79) quashing the same judgment of the first appellate court and for the reasons given therein we do so in this case also but without creating any precedent that rs.14,000/- per bigha of land was the market value in shakurpur village in reference to notification dated 24.10.1961. in the present case appellants are said to have received the negligible differential amount already and considering that their area of land was also small plot of 500 square yards or so, it would be unjust to upset the applecart now even if awarded amount was liable to be reduced.4. thereforee, all told we allow this appeal and quash judgment dated 17.10.1979 passed in rfa no. 225/70 and affirm that of reference court dated 22.1.1970 passed in lac 182/68.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Khan, J.

1. Appellants land measuring 500 square yards was acquired in Village Shakurpur pursuant to Section 4 Notification dated 24.10.1961. Reference Court awarded them compensation at the rate of Rs.14,000/- per bigha by relying upon a sale deed ext. -A2 dated 9.11.1959. This made a difference of only Rs.2,375/- to each claimant as against the award of the Collector.

2. All the same respondent filed an appeal against this (RFA No.225/70) which was disposed off by First Appellate Court in terms of Bhagmal's case which in turn was disposed off in terms of Ram Mehr's case (RFA No. 409/71) awarding general compensation of Rs.8,000/- per bigha of land in Shakurpur village, and having the consequence the reducing the compensation in the present case to few thousands of rupees.

3. Appellants feel aggrieved of this and have filed this appeal. We have already decided a connected appeal (LPA No.256/79) quashing the same judgment of the First Appellate court and for the reasons given therein we do so in this case also but without creating any precedent that Rs.14,000/- per bigha of land was the market value in Shakurpur Village in reference to Notification dated 24.10.1961. In the present case appellants are said to have received the negligible differential amount already and considering that their area of land was also small plot of 500 square yards or so, it would be unjust to upset the applecart now even if awarded amount was liable to be reduced.

4. thereforee, all told we allow this appeal and quash judgment dated 17.10.1979 passed in RFA No. 225/70 and affirm that of Reference Court dated 22.1.1970 passed in LAC 182/68.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial