Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Research Foundation for Science Vs. Union of India and anr.

Research Foundation for Science; Union of India (Uoi) and ors. vs Union of India and anr.;goyal Impex and Industries Ltd. and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Sep 24, 1999
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/675128

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition (C) No. 657 of 1995 with SLP (C) No. 16175 of 1997
Subject
Environment

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Environment

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Research Foundation for Science; Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Respondent

Union of India and anr.;goyal Impex and Industries Ltd. and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
1999(6)SCALE345; (2000)9SCC41

Excerpt

- order1. i.a. no. 11: affidavit be filed by mr. pp malhotra on behalf of ministry of labour within a week with copy to mr. sanjay parikh who may give his response within two weeks thereafter. the affidavit along with the response should then be sent to the high power committee for its consideration with regard to term of reference no. (iv). the report may be given within four weeks of the committee receiving the said affidavit/response.2. i.a. no. 12: issue notice mr. altaf ahmed, asg accepts notice on behalf of ministry of environment & forests. direction is given to the ministry of environment & forests to render proper and effective assistance and support to the high power committee so as to enable the committee to complete its work at the earliest. 1a is disposed of.3. with regard to the term contained in page 13 of the report of the high power committee, the said report gives the recommendations. the other terms of reference contained in the notification dated 17th october, 1997 have yet to be dealt with and reports submitted by the high power committee. now that direction has been issued to the ministry of environment & forests to render all assistance in the manner required by prof. menon, it is hoped that the final reports will be submitted at the earliest. mr. vijay panjwani has drawn our attention to the letter dated 30th july, 1998 (page 209 of the report) in which it is stated that the high power committee was expected to give its recommendations by january 1999. perhaps because full assistance was not rendered, the reports which were proposed have not been finalised. it is hoped that these reports will be submitted without much delay.4. to come up for further orders on 10th december, 1999.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. I.A. No. 11: Affidavit be filed by Mr. PP Malhotra on behalf of Ministry of Labour within a week with copy to Mr. Sanjay Parikh who may give his response within two weeks thereafter. The affidavit along with the response should then be sent to the High Power Committee for its consideration with regard to term of reference No. (iv). The report may be given within four weeks of the Committee receiving the said affidavit/response.

2. I.A. No. 12: Issue notice Mr. Altaf Ahmed, ASG accepts notice on behalf of Ministry of Environment & Forests. Direction is given to the Ministry of Environment & Forests to render proper and effective assistance and support to the High Power Committee so as to enable the Committee to complete its work at the earliest. 1A is disposed of.

3. With regard to the term contained in page 13 of the Report of the High Power Committee, the said Report gives the recommendations. The other terms of reference contained in the Notification dated 17th October, 1997 have yet to be dealt with and reports submitted by the High Power Committee. Now that direction has been issued to the Ministry of Environment & Forests to render all assistance in the manner required by Prof. Menon, it is hoped that the final Reports will be submitted at the earliest. Mr. Vijay Panjwani has drawn our attention to the letter dated 30th July, 1998 (page 209 of the Report) in which it is stated that the High Power Committee was expected to give its recommendations by January 1999. Perhaps because full assistance was not rendered, the reports which were proposed have not been finalised. It is hoped that these reports will be submitted without much delay.

4. To come up for further orders on 10th December, 1999.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial