Advanced Search Results
Indian Council for Environ Legal Action and anr. Vs. Union of India (U ...
Karnataka
Aug-29-1997
ConstitutionEnvironment
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 48A and 51A; Environment (Protection) Act, 1976; Water Pollution Control Act, 1974; Air Pollution Control Act, 1981
ILR1997KAR2956
project was also supported by the report of Dr. Chokkalingam, Annamalai University, who was requested to carry out environmental impact study. In the meanwhile, NTPC also evinced interest in establishing a super-thermal power plant at the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-20-2001
EnvironmentConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39, 41, 43, 48-A, 51-A and A (G) and 226; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Water (Prevention, Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989; The Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977
2002(2)ALT193
into natural water body and the construction activity in the surrounding areas is destroying the rock formation. The environmentalists fear that most of the sewage from even the Hi-tech city will be delivered into the lake. 'If
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.D. Jayal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-01-2003
EnvironmentCivil
Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32; Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(5) and 19; Administrative Law; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1); Environmental Rules, 1986 - Rule 5; International and Domestic Law
JT2003(Suppl2)SC1; 2003(7)SCALE54; (2004)9SCC362; AIR 2004 SC 867
32 of the Constitution of India is the second round of legal action connected to the safety and environmental aspects of Tehri Dam before this Court. 2. The petitioners herein firstly urge us; to issue necessary directions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Oct-18-2000
EnvironmentConstitution
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973
AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94
Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India as its Chairperson, Secretaries in the Ministry of Power, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ministry of Welfare, Chief Secretaries of the concerned four States as Members. In addition thereto, there
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad (Through K.M. Chinnappa) Vs. Union of Indi ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-30-2002
Environment
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 35(1)(4)(5); Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 24-B; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Section 349; Conservation Act - Section 3
(2002)10SCC606
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. By destroying nature, environment, man is committing matricide, having in a way killed Mother Earth. Technological excellence, growth of industries, economical gains
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentre for Environmental Law World Wide Fund for Nature (Wkf), India V ...
Orissa
May-14-1998
Environment
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1999Ori15
petition as a publicity seeking gimmick. They have asserted that the petitioner, and large number of such so-called environment lovers are in reality perpetrating fraud on the judicial system by presenting 'publicity interest litigation' in the garb
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Jagannath Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-11-1996
Environment
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 41, 48-A, 51-A and 253; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5; Fisheries Act, 1897; Wild Life Protection Act, 1972; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
AIR1997SC811; 1997(1)Crimes189(SC); JT1997(1)SC160; 1997(5)SCALE406; (1997)2SCC87; [1996]Supp9SCR848; 1996 INSC 1466
investment return and enjoys an expanding market. The said expectation is sought to be achieved by replacing the environmentally benign traditional mode of culture by semi-intensive and intensive methods. More and more areas are being brought under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-2004
Environment
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 23; National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4 and 5; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 5, 5(3), 5(4) and 6(3); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Town and Country Planning Act; National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 4A, 22(4), 22(4A) and 22(5); Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Mineral Conservation and Dev
AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118
from the Delhi-Haryana border on the Haryana side of the ridge and also in the Aravalli hills causes environment degradation and what directions are required to be issued. The background in which the question has come up
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVellore Citizens Welfare Forum Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-1996
Environment
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3(3), 4, 5, 7 and 8; Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 226, 231, 249 to 253 and 338 to 342; Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1974 - Sections 63; The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1981; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 3(1 and 2) and 5(1)
AIR1996SC2715; JT1996(7)SC375; 1995(5)SCALE592; (1996)5SCC647; [1996]Supp5SCR241; 1996 INSC 952
residents of the area. It is stated that the tanneries in the State of Tamil Nadu have caused environmental degradation in the area. According to the preliminary survey made by the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Research center
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-12-2006
Environment
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 28, 28(1), 31 and 47; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966; Town Planning Act
AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371
as well as their cattle. It was also submitted that there would be an adverse impact on the environment of the villages as the industrial area increases. Their prayer in the petition was that the gomal lands
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free