Advanced Search Results

T. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39, 41, 43, 48-A, 51-A and A (G) and 226; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Water (Prevention, Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989; The Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT193

into natural water body and the construction activity in the surrounding areas is destroying the rock formation. The environmentalists fear that most of the sewage from even the Hi-tech city will be delivered into the lake. 'If

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India as its Chairperson, Secretaries in the Ministry of Power, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ministry of Welfare, Chief Secretaries of the concerned four States as Members. In addition thereto, there

T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad (Through K.M. Chinnappa) Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 35(1)(4)(5); Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 24-B; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Section 349; Conservation Act - Section 3

Reported in : (2002)10SCC606

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. By destroying nature, environment, man is committing matricide, having in a way killed Mother Earth. Technological excellence, growth of industries, economical gains

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 28, 28(1), 31 and 47; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966; Town Planning Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371

as well as their cattle. It was also submitted that there would be an adverse impact on the environment of the villages as the industrial area increases. Their prayer in the petition was that the gomal lands

Baldev Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC135

the petitioners in case the plant is set up it shall cause huge amount of pollution leading to environmental degradation. During the course of the proceedings some Gram Panchayats of the area were permitted to join as

Indian Council for Environ Legal Action and anr. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 48A and 51A; Environment (Protection) Act, 1976; Water Pollution Control Act, 1974; Air Pollution Control Act, 1981

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2956

project was also supported by the report of Dr. Chokkalingam, Annamalai University, who was requested to carry out environmental impact study. In the meanwhile, NTPC also evinced interest in establishing a super-thermal power plant at the said

S. Jagannath Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 41, 48-A, 51-A and 253; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5; Fisheries Act, 1897; Wild Life Protection Act, 1972; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

Reported in : AIR1997SC811; 1997(1)Crimes189(SC); JT1997(1)SC160; 1997(5)SCALE406; (1997)2SCC87; [1996]Supp9SCR848; 1996 INSC 1466

investment return and enjoys an expanding market. The said expectation is sought to be achieved by replacing the environmentally benign traditional mode of culture by semi-intensive and intensive methods. More and more areas are being brought under

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 23; National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4 and 5; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 5, 5(3), 5(4) and 6(3); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Town and Country Planning Act; National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 4A, 22(4), 22(4A) and 22(5); Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Mineral Conservation and Dev

Reported in : AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

from the Delhi-Haryana border on the Haryana side of the ridge and also in the Aravalli hills causes environment degradation and what directions are required to be issued. The background in which the question has come up

In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(1)A, 19(10), 21, 25, 141 and 142; Noise Pollution Control and Regulation Rules, 1999; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Noise Abetment Act, 1960 - Sections 2; Control on Pollution Act, 1974; Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act, 1993; Noise Control Act, 1975; Noise Control (Miscellaneous Articles) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control (Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Accessories) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control Ordinance; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95, 268, 290 and 291; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 89 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;

Reported in : AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733

'nausea'. It has been defined as 'unwanted sound, a potential hazard to health and communication dumped into the environment with regard to the adverse effect it may have on unwilling ears.'13. Noise is defined as unwanted sound.

N.D. Jayal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32; Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(5) and 19; Administrative Law; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1); Environmental Rules, 1986 - Rule 5; International and Domestic Law

Reported in : JT2003(Suppl2)SC1; 2003(7)SCALE54; (2004)9SCC362; AIR 2004 SC 867

32 of the Constitution of India is the second round of legal action connected to the safety and environmental aspects of Tehri Dam before this Court. 2. The petitioners herein firstly urge us; to issue necessary directions