Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. B.M. Joshi Vs. Second Additional Distt. Judge and ors.

Dr. B.M. Joshi vs Second Additional Distt. Judge and ors.

Disposition Appeal Disposed Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jan 06, 1987
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/665116

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Appeal No. 844 of 1986
Subject
Tenancy
Disposition
Appeal Disposed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- [ M.M. Dutt and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.] - Rent Control and Eviction — Eviction — Possession of the premises already taken by landlord — Having regard to philanthropic services rendered to the community by the appellant tenant, a 75 years old doctor of repute, Rent Control and Eviction Officer dir...

Key legal issue
Tenancy
Outcome / disposition
Appeal Disposed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. B.M. Joshi

Respondent

Second Additional Distt. Judge and ors.

Advocate Mr. Gopal Subramaniam

Legal References

Reported In
(1987)3SCC525

Excerpt

- [ m.m. dutt and; ranganath misra, jj.] - rent control and eviction - eviction - possession of the premises already taken by landlord - having regard to philanthropic services rendered to the community by the appellant tenant, a 75 years old doctor of repute, rent control and eviction officer directed to allot him a convenient accommodation early and preferably within 3 months -- mr gopal subramaniam, appearing for the respondents, states that respondent 5, mr upadhyay has in the meantime, written to the appellant, dr joshi, in that behalf. we suggest that the rent control and eviction officer should find out a convenient accommodation for dr joshi and once such accommodation is identified, the same should be allotted to him.m.m. dutt and; ranganath misra, jj.1. it is conceded that during the pendency of the appeal possession of the disputed premises has passed on to the landlord and he is now in possession. in view of this situation the civil appeal has to be dismissed.2. it was submitted on the earlier occasion that while taking possession some force, not warranted in the facts of the case, had been used. on behalf of respondent 5, the decree-holder, regrets were expressed and that fact has been recorded in the proceedings of the court. mr gopal subramaniam, appearing for the respondents, states that respondent 5, mr upadhyay has in the meantime, written to the appellant, dr joshi, in that behalf.3. it appears that dr joshi is a homeopath of repute and is now old. he has dedicated himself to the service of the community. keeping this aspect in view, this court had suggested that an alternate accommodation could be looked for him. some premises have been identified but learned counsel for the appellant says that these are all in the first floor and the appellant on account of his present state of health would not find any of them convenient. we suggest that the rent control and eviction officer should find out a convenient accommodation for dr joshi and once such accommodation is identified, the same should be allotted to him. this direction is given in consideration of the fact that dr joshi who is said to be over 75 years of age is engaged in philanthropic service to the community. we commend to the authorities that such allotment may be made at an early date and preferably within three months from now.4. the appeal is disposed of without any order for costs.

Full Judgment

M.M. Dutt and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.

1. It is conceded that during the pendency of the appeal possession of the disputed premises has passed on to the landlord and he is now in possession. In view of this situation the civil appeal has to be dismissed.

2. It was submitted on the earlier occasion that while taking possession some force, not warranted in the facts of the case, had been used. On behalf of Respondent 5, the decree-holder, regrets were expressed and that fact has been recorded in the proceedings of the court. Mr Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the respondents, states that Respondent 5, Mr Upadhyay has in the meantime, written to the appellant, Dr Joshi, in that behalf.

3. It appears that Dr Joshi is a homeopath of repute and is now old. He has dedicated himself to the service of the community. Keeping this aspect in view, this Court had suggested that an alternate accommodation could be looked for him. Some premises have been identified but learned counsel for the appellant says that these are all in the first floor and the appellant on account of his present state of health would not find any of them convenient. We suggest that the Rent Control and Eviction Officer should find out a convenient accommodation for Dr Joshi and once such accommodation is identified, the same should be allotted to him. This direction is given in consideration of the fact that Dr Joshi who is said to be over 75 years of age is engaged in philanthropic service to the community. We commend to the authorities that such allotment may be made at an early date and preferably within three months from now.

4. The appeal is disposed of without any order for costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial