Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.K. Das and anr. Vs. Brojinder Nath Dhur (for Contempt)

A.K. Das and anr. vs Brojinder Nath Dhur (for Contempt)

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Sep 01, 1986
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/660574

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 4416-18 of 1986
Subject
Tenancy

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- [ M.M. Dutt and; O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.] -- Rent Control and Eviction — Eviction — Delivery of possession pursuant to eviction order — Trial court directed to appoint advocate commissioner of the court to give possession -- The Commissioner may also take police help, if necessary, to deliver po...

Key legal issue
Tenancy

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.K. Das and anr.

Respondent

Brojinder Nath Dhur (for Contempt)

Legal References

Reported In
1986(Supp)SCC572

Excerpt

- [ m.m. dutt and; o. chinnappa reddy, jj.] -- rent control and eviction - eviction - delivery of possession pursuant to eviction order - trial court directed to appoint advocate commissioner of the court to give possession -- the commissioner may also take police help, if necessary, to deliver possession to the landlord. in regard to part of the premises in occupation of a.p. sharma, the tenant is given time till september 30, 1986 to vacate the premises. if he does not vacate the premises by september 30, 1986 the trial court is directed to deliver vacant possession to the landlord with police help, if necessary - the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronounced an advocate commissioner will be appointed by the trial court to give possession of the premises to the landlord and the tenant is given time till september 30, 1986 to vacate the premises and in case of failure the trial court is directed to give vacant possession with police help if necessary.m.m. dutt and; o. chinnappa reddy, jj.1. so far as the premises in occupation of das gupta is concerned, learned counsel appearing for him states that he has already delivered possession while it is disputed by learned counsel for the landlord. the trial court will appoint an advocate commissioner of the court to give possession of the premises to the landlord on an appointed day in presence of aforesaid das gupta. the commissioner may also take police help, if necessary, to deliver possession to the landlord. in regard to part of the premises in occupation of a.p. sharma, the tenant is given time till september 30, 1986 to vacate the premises. if he does not vacate the premises by september 30, 1986 the trial court is directed to deliver vacant possession to the landlord with police help, if necessary. the applications for contempt are discharged.

Full Judgment

M.M. Dutt and; O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.

1. So far as the premises in occupation of Das Gupta is concerned, learned counsel appearing for him states that he has already delivered possession while it is disputed by learned counsel for the landlord. The trial court will appoint an advocate commissioner of the court to give possession of the premises to the landlord on an appointed day in presence of aforesaid Das Gupta. The Commissioner may also take police help, if necessary, to deliver possession to the landlord. In regard to part of the premises in occupation of A.P. Sharma, the tenant is given time till September 30, 1986 to vacate the premises. If he does not vacate the premises by September 30, 1986 the trial court is directed to deliver vacant possession to the landlord with police help, if necessary. The applications for contempt are discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial