Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sebi Vs. Malvika Steel Ltd.

Sebi vs Malvika Steel Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT Decided Jan 27, 2005
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/57950

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sebi

Respondent

Malvika Steel Ltd.

Excerpt

.....on 16.10.04 vide letter dated 24.09.04. i note that the msl failed to appear for the personal hearing.5. msl has neither replied to the show cause notice nor attended the personal hearing. it, therefore failed to avail the opportunity.6. under sub section (2) of section 6 of the depositories act, 1996, msl on receipt of certificate of security for dematerialization, was required to cancel the certificate of security and substitute in its records the name of the depository as a registered owner in respect of that security and inform the depository accordingly. further, regulation 53 read with sub regulation (5) of regulation 54 of sebi (depositories and participants) regulation, 1996 mandates that the issuer company should within 15 days of receipt of certificate of security from the participants, mutilate and cancel the certificate and substitute in its records the name of the depository as its registered owner.7. in view of the above provisions of law, the issuer company was under an obligation to complete the process of dematerialization within the above stipulated period under the regulations. the conduct of msl in keeping dematerialization requests pending for more than 30 days is detrimental to the interest of the investors/ shareholders in as much as the investors/ shareholders could not sell their shares at an opportune time. thus it had deprived the share holders of the liquidity of their investments and loss of opportunity to sell the dematerialized shares.8. i note that msl failed to discharge its obligation towards investors to meet the requests for dematerialization in contravention of the aforesaid provisions of law as reported by nsdl and therefore violated the provisions of regulation 53 read with regulation 54(5) of sebi (depositories and participants) regulation, 1996.9. i note that 820 dematerialization requests are still pending with msl, although the process of dematerialization was required to be completed within 15 days from the date of.....

Full Judgment

1. The National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL)/ Central Depository Services Ltd. (CDSL) informed SEBI that 820 requests of dematerialization were pending for more than 30 days against Malvika Steel Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "MSL") as on December 12, 2003.

2. Thereafter, SEBI issued a show cause notice dated 09.02.04 to MSL advising it to show cause as to why action should not be initiated against it for violating the provisions of Regulation 53 read with Regulation 54(5) of SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulation, 1996 and the Depositories Act, 1996 for the delay in dematerialization.

3. I note that MSL has not replied to the said show cause notice till date.

4. An opportunity to appear before the Chairman, SEBI was given to MSL on 16.10.04 vide letter dated 24.09.04. I note that the MSL failed to appear for the personal hearing.

5. MSL has neither replied to the Show Cause Notice nor attended the personal hearing. It, therefore failed to avail the opportunity.

6. Under Sub Section (2) of Section 6 of the Depositories Act, 1996, MSL on receipt of certificate of security for dematerialization, was required to cancel the certificate of security and substitute in its records the name of the depository as a registered owner in respect of that security and inform the depository accordingly. Further, Regulation 53 read with Sub Regulation (5) of Regulation 54 of SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulation, 1996 mandates that the issuer company should within 15 days of receipt of certificate of security from the participants, mutilate and cancel the certificate and substitute in its records the name of the depository as its registered owner.

7. In view of the above provisions of law, the issuer company was under an obligation to complete the process of dematerialization within the above stipulated period under the regulations. The conduct of MSL in keeping dematerialization requests pending for more than 30 days is detrimental to the interest of the investors/ shareholders in as much as the investors/ shareholders could not sell their shares at an opportune time. Thus it had deprived the share holders of the liquidity of their investments and loss of opportunity to sell the dematerialized shares.

8. I note that MSL failed to discharge its obligation towards investors to meet the requests for dematerialization in contravention of the aforesaid provisions of law as reported by NSDL and therefore violated the provisions of Regulation 53 read with regulation 54(5) of SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulation, 1996.

9. I note that 820 dematerialization requests are still pending with MSL, although the process of dematerialization was required to be completed within 15 days from the date of receipt of shares from investors in accordance with SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996. The delay in dematerialization being prejudicial to the interests of shareholders, is viewed seriously.

10. Now, therefore in exercise of powers conferred under Section 19 of the Depositories Act, 1996, I hereby direct that all the pending requests for dematerialization of shares from shareholders shall be completed by MSL within one month from the date of receipt of this order and a compliance report thereto be submitted to SEBI, failing which, Malvika Steel Ltd. shall stand automatically restrained from accessing the securities market and prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities for a period of 2 years.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial