Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chanda Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Chanda Devi vs State of Jharkhand and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 29, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/517062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C) No. 1155 of 2002
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue
Service
Acts & sections
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chanda Devi

Advocate Aparesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors.

Advocate JC to SC-II for the State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
Reported In
[2004(2)JCR620(Jhr)]

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant.orderamareshwar sahay, j.1. from perusal of annexure-5 to the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner which is a copy of the proceeding of the meeting dated 4.12.2003 it appears that the government of jharkhand has taken certain decision with regard to regularisation/absorption of the work charge/dally wages employees working as such since long. the claim of the petitioner is that her husband was also working as work charge employee for more than 10 years and, therefore, her husband was entitled to be regularised/absorbed. she has prayed for compassionate appointment in place of her husband who died in harness.2. in my view at this stage, no direction is required to be issued to the respondents since the government is already proceeding ahead in this matter as it appears from the resolutions contained in annexure-5.3. in that view of the matter, this application is disposed of with an observation that if any decision regarding regularisation/ absorption of the work charge/dally wage employees is taken by the government, then the petitioner will have the liberty to make a representation before the authority concerned claiming appointment on compassionate ground. the petitioner if so advised may file such representation with supporting documents which shall considered by the concerned authorities sympathetically.this writ application stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. From perusal of Annexure-5 to the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner which is a copy of the proceeding of the meeting dated 4.12.2003 it appears that the Government of Jharkhand has taken certain decision with regard to regularisation/absorption of the work charge/dally wages employees working as such since long. The claim of the petitioner is that her husband was also working as work charge employee for more than 10 years and, therefore, her husband was entitled to be regularised/absorbed. She has prayed for compassionate appointment in place of her husband who died in harness.

2. In my view at this stage, no direction is required to be issued to the respondents since the Government is already proceeding ahead in this matter as it appears from the resolutions contained in Annexure-5.

3. In that view of the matter, this application is disposed of with an observation that if any decision regarding regularisation/ absorption of the work charge/dally wage employees is taken by the Government, then the petitioner will have the liberty to make a representation before the authority concerned claiming appointment on compassionate ground. The petitioner if so advised may file such representation with supporting documents which shall considered by the concerned authorities sympathetically.

This writ application stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial