Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Elwari KamIn @ Elwari Devi Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Elwari KamIn @ Elwari Devi vs Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 16, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/515786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P. (S) No. 583 of 2005
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Elwari KamIn @ Elwari Devi

Advocate Om Prakash Prasad, Adv.

Respondent

Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Advocate Sheela Prasad, G.P. IV and; Ananda Sen, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In
[2005(2)JCR326a(Jhr)]

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant.orders.j. mukhopadhaya, a.c.j.1. according to petitioner, her husband, late maina munda was in the services of m/s. central coalfields ltd. (hereinafter it shall be referred to as 'c.c.l.' for short) and died in harness on 19.6.2000. her grievance is that the respondents have not paid c.m.p.f. amount though she represented before the authorities.2. in the facts and circumstances, as the matter requires determination by the respondents at first instance, the case is remitted with direction to the 4th respondent. personnel manager, central coalfields ltd., jharkhand colliery, charhi area, hazaribagh to forward the relevant documents to the regional commissioner, c.m.p.f., region no. ii, ranchi within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if it has not yet been forwarded. the regional commissioner, c.m.p.f., region no. ii, ranchi, in his turn, is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate order. if any amount is found payable to the widow of late maina munda, the respondents will pay it within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order falling which they will be liable to pay additional interest at the rate of 5 per cent from the date of death of the employee. on the other hand, if one or other authority disputes the claim will communicate the grounds to the petitioner.3. it may be mentioned that this court has not decided the claim of the petitioner on merit.4. this writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations/directions.

Full Judgment

ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.

1. According to petitioner, her husband, late Maina Munda was in the services of M/s. Central Coalfields Ltd. (hereinafter it shall be referred to as 'C.C.L.' for short) and died in harness on 19.6.2000. Her grievance is that the respondents have not paid C.M.P.F. amount though she represented before the authorities.

2. In the facts and circumstances, as the matter requires determination by the respondents at first instance, the case is remitted with direction to the 4th respondent. Personnel Manager, Central Coalfields Ltd., Jharkhand Colliery, Charhi Area, Hazaribagh to forward the relevant documents to the Regional Commissioner, C.M.P.F., Region No. II, Ranchi within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if it has not yet been forwarded. The Regional Commissioner, C.M.P.F., Region No. II, Ranchi, in his turn, is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate order. If any amount is found payable to the widow of late Maina Munda, the respondents will pay it within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order falling which they will be liable to pay additional interest at the rate of 5 per cent from the date of death of the employee. On the other hand, if one or other authority disputes the claim will communicate the grounds to the petitioner.

3. It may be mentioned that this Court has not decided the claim of the petitioner on merit.

4. This writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations/directions.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial