Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Most. Kaushalya Devi Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Most. Kaushalya Devi vs Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 13, 2005
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/514976

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P. (S) No. 123 of 2005
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue
Service
Acts & sections
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Most. Kaushalya Devi

Advocate A.K. Sahani, Adv.

Respondent

Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Advocate Ananda Sen, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
Reported In
[2005(1)JCR498(Jhr)]

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant......authority sitting in the headquarter took a decision that since the name of the petitioner was not entered in the service book so she is not entitled to get appointment on compassionate ground.3. this court takes judicial notice of the following facts :-(i) the decision taken by the competent authority is never communicated to the applicant. only the applicant is informed about the decision taken by the competent authority.(ii) even this court is not aware whether the competent authority sitting in the headquarters takes a decision by simply rejecting the application or by passing a reasoned order. such decision has never been filed by the respondents in any of the writ petitions filed by the persons seeking compassionate appointment.4. i have come across many cases where i found that the competent authority do not apply their mind and never realize the difficulties of those dependants who starve because of the death of bread earner.5. henceforth, any such decision taken by the competent authority in any of such cases for compassionate appointment shall be supplied to the applicant along with a letter of communication of such decision.6. in the instant case as noticed above there is nothing to show that the authority have denied the fact that the petitioner is not legally married wife and her husband died only after 5 months back.7. in such circumstances, rejection of the application by the competent authority on the ground that her name was not entered in the service book is absolutely illegal, arbitrary, capricious and whimsical.8. for the aforesaid reason, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to immediately take a decision giving compassionate appointment to the petitioner. such decision must be taken within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.9. let a copy of this order be sent to the chairman-cum-managing director of ccl to issue standing instruction to the officers who constitutes a.....

Full Judgment

ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. By the Court.-The petitioner has prayed for quashing the communication as contained in letter dated 30.6.2004 issued under the signature of Senior Personnel, Officer, Religara Colliery, Central Coalfields Limited informing the petitioner that her application for compassionate appointment has been rejected.

2. The petitioner's case is that her husband Sama Kumar was a permanent employee working in Religara Colliery and he was married with the petitioner on 18.5.2001 and about five months thereafter he died in-harness. The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment and submitted all the papers including an affidavit sworn by her mother-in-law that the petitioner is the legally married wife. The name of the petitioner was forwarded by the Religara Colliery to the competent authority for taking a decision. The competent authority sitting in the headquarter took a decision that since the name of the petitioner was not entered in the service book so she is not entitled to get appointment on compassionate ground.

3. This Court takes judicial notice of the following facts :-

(i) The decision taken by the competent authority is never communicated to the applicant. Only the applicant is informed about the decision taken by the competent authority.

(ii) Even this Court is not aware whether the competent authority sitting in the headquarters takes a decision by simply rejecting the application or by passing a reasoned order. Such decision has never been filed by the respondents in any of the writ petitions filed by the persons seeking compassionate appointment.

4. I have come across many cases where I found that the competent authority do not apply their mind and never realize the difficulties of those dependants who starve because of the death of bread earner.

5. Henceforth, any such decision taken by the competent authority in any of such cases for compassionate appointment shall be supplied to the applicant along with a letter of communication of such decision.

6. In the instant case as noticed above there is nothing to show that the authority have denied the fact that the petitioner is not legally married wife and her husband died only after 5 months back.

7. In such circumstances, rejection of the application by the competent authority on the ground that her name was not entered in the service book is absolutely illegal, arbitrary, capricious and whimsical.

8. For the aforesaid reason, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to immediately take a decision giving compassionate appointment to the petitioner. Such decision must be taken within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of CCL to issue standing instruction to the officers who constitutes a Committee for taking decision in the matter of compassionate appointment. Ordered accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial