Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. Prabhakar Singh Vs. M.D., U.P. Seeds and Tarai Development Corporation and ors.

Dr. Prabhakar Singh vs M.D., U.P. Seeds and Tarai Development Corporation and ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Uttaranchal Decided May 03, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/513820

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Uttaranchal High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.W.P. No. 720/2001
Subject
Labour and Industrial
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Prabhakar Singh

Advocate Patni, Adv.

Respondent

M.D., U.P. Seeds and Tarai Development Corporation and ors.

Advocate Dobhal, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In
[2001(90)FLR1038]; (2002)IIILLJ18UC

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant.a.a. desai, c.j. and p.c. verma, j. 1. heard mr. patni, learned counsel for the petitioner and sri dobhal learned counsel for the respondents at length.2. the petitioner was sent on deputation to tarai seed corporation since 1999. initially the corporation proposed to absorb the petitioner on the condition if he obtains no objection certificate or resigns from the parent department. the tentative order of absorption however was cancelled before the petitioner could obtain no objection certificate. the main theme of argument of mr. patni is that he was entitled to be heard and no such opportunity was granted therefore the order was vitiated. looking at the background no right was vested. the impugned order has not divested any right, further repatriating an officer to the parent department is neither punishment nor a stigma. the submission is, therefore, devoid of merits. we do not see any reason to interfere with the order of repatriating the petitioner.3. petition dismissed.

Full Judgment

A.A. Desai, C.J. and P.C. Verma, J.

1. Heard Mr. Patni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dobhal learned counsel for the respondents at length.

2. The petitioner was sent on deputation to Tarai Seed Corporation since 1999. Initially the corporation proposed to absorb the petitioner on the condition if he obtains no objection certificate or resigns from the parent department. The tentative order of absorption however was cancelled before the petitioner could obtain no objection certificate. The main theme of argument of Mr. Patni is that he was entitled to be heard and no such opportunity was granted therefore the order was vitiated. Looking at the background no right was vested. The impugned order has not divested any right, further repatriating an officer to the parent department is neither punishment nor a stigma. The submission is, therefore, devoid of merits. We do not see any reason to interfere with the order of repatriating the petitioner.

3. Petition dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial