Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gopal Vs. Manju

Gopal vs Manju

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 15, 1993
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/502358

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. 118 of 1992
Subject
Family
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Section 306 :[Dalveer Bhandari & Harjit Singh Bedi,JJ] Abetment of suicide Deceased, a married woman, committed suicide - Allegation of abetment of suicide against appellant husband and in-laws - Ocular evidence was sketchy - Dying declaration recorded by Tahsildar completely exonerated all...

Key legal issue
Family
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed
Acts & sections
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 287; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gopal

Advocate Champalal Yadav, Adv.

Respondent

Manju

Advocate J.W. Mahajan and ;R.P.C. Sanghi, Advs.

Legal References

Acts
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 287; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
Reported In
II(1993)DMC395

Excerpt

- indian penal code, 1890.section 306 :[dalveer bhandari & harjit singh bedi,jj] abetment of suicide deceased, a married woman, committed suicide - allegation of abetment of suicide against appellant husband and in-laws - ocular evidence was sketchy - dying declaration recorded by tahsildar completely exonerated all accused in-laws of any misconduct dispelling any suspicion as to their involvement - letter of threat allegedly written by appellant to father of victim was concocted piece of evidence held, though presumption against appellant can be raised, it cannot be said that onus shifts exclusively and heavily on him to prove his innocence. conviction of appellant is liable to be set aside. - 2. by order dated 7-8-92 a show cause notice against admission of this appeal as well as against the application under section 5 of the limitation act were directed to be issued to the respondent. they desired and decided to live hereafter comfortably and demonstrated an urge to say good bye to the litigations of this nature. 5. i am happy to place on record my appreciation of the sincere efforts made by the parties as also by their respective counsels towards the settlement of this issue......seriously engaged in the efforts towards reconciliation.2. by order dated 7-8-92 a show cause notice against admission of this appeal as well as against the application under section 5 of the limitation act were directed to be issued to the respondent. later by order dated 21-1-93, orders were also passed for keeping the parties present in the court for the purpose of making efforts at reconciliation between them.3. parties are present today in preson. they appear to be educated and matured persons. on explaining the object behind presence and proceedings of reconciliation, the parties saw enough light and opted to discuss matter between themselves with a surge of an urge to iron out their differences which appeared to be resting on the fulcrum of clash of ego rather than any irreconcilable discord. after this exercise, the parties bearing smile on their faces reported back to submit that the matter has been finally settled and as such there existed no cause to seek relief of divorce. they desired and decided to live hereafter comfortably and demonstrated an urge to say good bye to the litigations of this nature.4. in these circumstances, the appellant expressed his desire not to press this appeal. the appeal is, accordingly dismissed as not pressed. parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal as incurred.5. i am happy to place on record my appreciation of the sincere efforts made by the parties as also by their respective counsels towards the settlement of this issue.6. undoubtedly, such matters entail a human problem rather than a legal problem as such.7. in the circumstances, while anesthetizing matter i part with the case with pious hope that the parties shall now open a new chapter in their life to bury the bitter feelings for all time to come and shall stop worrying and start living in peace and harmony proving real worth of their life partnership which is never intended to be one at will.8. the appeal is consequently dismissed.

Full Judgment

A.R. Tiwari, J.

1. The appellant-husband had filed a petition seeking relief of divorce Under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Court of Additional Judge to the Court of the District Judge, Indore. This petition was registered as Hindu Marriage Case No. 343 of 1991. By order dated 12-3-92, this petition was, however, dismissed on the linchpin of the conclusion that grounds of cruelty and desertion as alleged, were not established. Against this judgment, the appellant has preferred this appeal. This appeal, was, however, barred by time to the extent of 82 days. A separate application Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, supported by an affidavit was also filed. The condonation was prayed and as attempt was made to explain this delay on the ground that parties were during that period seriously engaged in the efforts towards reconciliation.

2. By order dated 7-8-92 a show cause notice against admission of this appeal as well as against the application Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act were directed to be issued to the respondent. Later by order dated 21-1-93, orders were also passed for keeping the parties present in the Court for the purpose of making efforts at reconciliation between them.

3. Parties are present today in preson. They appear to be educated and matured persons. On explaining the object behind presence and proceedings of reconciliation, the parties saw enough light and opted to discuss matter between themselves with a surge of an urge to iron out their differences which appeared to be resting on the fulcrum of clash of ego rather than any irreconcilable discord. After this exercise, the parties bearing smile on their faces reported back to submit that the matter has been finally settled and as such there existed no cause to seek relief of divorce. They desired and decided to live hereafter comfortably and demonstrated an urge to say good bye to the litigations of this nature.

4. In these circumstances, the appellant expressed his desire not to press this appeal. The appeal is, accordingly dismissed as not pressed. Parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal as incurred.

5. I am happy to place on record my appreciation of the sincere efforts made by the parties as also by their respective Counsels towards the settlement of this issue.

6. Undoubtedly, such matters entail a human problem rather than a legal problem as such.

7. In the circumstances, while anesthetizing matter I part with the case with pious hope that the parties shall now open a new chapter in their life to bury the bitter feelings for all time to come and shall stop worrying and start living in peace and harmony proving real worth of their life partnership which is never intended to be one at will.

8. The appeal is consequently dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial