Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Girraj Kishore and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Girraj Kishore and Another vs State of U.P. and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jul 24, 1998
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/484260

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M.W.P. No. 23833 of 1998
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service - employment - termination of a person holding respectable position - held, cannot be challenged. -

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Girraj Kishore and Another

Advocate Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

Respondent

State of U.P. and Others

Advocate S.C.

Legal References

Reported In
1998(4)AWC166; [1999(81)FLR88]

Excerpt

service - employment - termination of a person holding respectable position - held, cannot be challenged. - m. katju, j.1. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.2. the petitioners were appointed on an honorary post. in my opinion a person holding an honorary post has no legal right to challenge the termination order. the petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

M. Katju, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. The petitioners were appointed on an honorary post. In my opinion a person holding an honorary post has no legal right to challenge the termination order. The petition is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial