Pawan Kumar Verma Vs. District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Pawan Kumar Verma vs District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Allahabad Decided Oct 29, 1996

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/480950

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/480950
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: M. Katju, J.
Decided On: Oct 29, 1996
Case Number: C.M.W.P. No. 34277/1996
Subject: Labour and Industrial
Disposition: Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Labour and Industrial
Outcome / disposition: Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Kumar Verma

Advocate B.S. Kulshrestha, Adv.

Respondent

District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Advocate S.C.

Legal References

Cases Referred: Haryana State Electricity Board v. Naresh Tanwar and
Reported In: (1997)IILLJ515All

Excerpt

- m. katju, j.1. the petitioner father died as a teacher of a college in 1980 and the petitioner is claiming his appointment under dying in harness rules. it is settled law that appointment under dying in harness cannot be given long after the death of the father vide harvansh sahai srivastava v. state of u.p. and others, 1990(1) u.p.l.b.e.c.220 u.p. state road transport corporation v. avi-ral kumar mishra, 1995 (1) u.p.l.b.e.c.21(lucknow bench), haryana state electricity board v. naresh tanwar and another etc. etc j.t. 1996(2) s.c.542. it has been held in these decisions that the purpose of dying in harness rules is to provide immediate financial aid to the family which is in economic distress due to the death of the bread earner. the petitioner is claiming appointment long after the death of his father. there is no force in this petition and it is accordingly dismissed.

Full Judgment

M. Katju, J.

1. The petitioner father died as a teacher of a college in 1980 and the petitioner is claiming his appointment under Dying in Harness Rules. It is settled law that appointment under dying in harness cannot be given long after the death of the father vide Harvansh Sahai Srivastava v. State of U.P. and others, 1990(1) U.P.L.B.E.C.220 U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Avi-ral Kumar Mishra, 1995 (1) U.P.L.B.E.C.21(Lucknow Bench), Haryana State Electricity Board v. Naresh Tanwar and another etc. etc J.T. 1996(2) S.C.542. It has been held in these decisions that the purpose of Dying in Harness Rules is to provide immediate financial aid to the family which is in economic distress due to the death of the bread earner. The petitioner is claiming appointment long after the death of his father. There is no force in this petition and it is accordingly dismissed.

Same Court & Year Allahabad · 1996 Same Parties Pawan Kumar Verma vs District Inspector of Schools and ors. Same Subject Labour and Industrial Same Judge M. Katju, J.

Labour and Industrial