Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Om Prakash and Others Vs. U. P. State Electricity Board, Lucknow and Others</B>

Om Prakash and Others vs U. P. State Electricity Board, Lucknow and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 25, 1999
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/480261

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M.W.P. No. 21784 of 1999
Subject
Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Labour and Industrial - appointment - Section 6Q of U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - recruitment of filling up vacancies arising in S.C. and O.B.C. quota challenged - petitioner alleging as he is retrenched employee his case to be considered before recruitment in S.C. and O.B.C. quota - contending recruitment o...

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial
Acts & sections
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6Q

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Om Prakash and Others

Advocate Shyamji Gaur, Adv.

Respondent

U. P. State Electricity Board, Lucknow and Others

Advocate S.P. Mehrotra, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6Q
Cases Referred
U. P. Bijli Karmchari Sangh v. U. P. State Electricity Board and
Reported In
1999(3)AWC1996

Excerpt

labour and industrial - appointment - section 6q of u. p. industrial disputes act, 1947 - recruitment of filling up vacancies arising in s.c. and o.b.c. quota challenged - petitioner alleging as he is retrenched employee his case to be considered before recruitment in s.c. and o.b.c. quota - contending recruitment otherwise will violate section 6q - section 6q does not restrict recruitment in said quota - held, petitioner's case can be duly considered - recruitment in s.c. and o.b.c. quota cannot be challenged as it causes no prejudice to petitioner. - .....to mr. shyamji gaur before making such recruitment, the petitioner's case requires a consideration. according to him, by virtue of the said advertisement, the petitioner's right under section 6q has been taken away.2. the section 6q of the u. p. industrial disputes act does not prescribe that no recruitment at all be made before granting opportunity to retrenched employees under section 6q irrespective of the fact of the vacancies sought to be filled up are within the quota of the schedule caste and other backward classes. if there are vacancies in the quota of schedule caste and other backward classes, in that event, it is to be filled up only by the candidates from schedule caste and backward classes community. only when suchcandidates are not available, then the general candidates can be offered for employment. therefore, the petitioner cannot have any grievance with regard to the advertisement issued seeking to recruit the candidates from the schedule caste and other backward classes communities for filling up of reserved quota in accordance with law.3. in case, there are any vacancy, respondent seeks to make any recruitment from the general candidates, in that event, the petitioners may apply for such vacancy. the respondent shall consider such applications in accordance with section 6q of the u. p. industrial disputes act giving preference in the matter of employment provided each individual petitioner satisfies that he was a retrenched employee and is eligible and entitled to be re-employed in terms of section 6q of the said act while considering the question of selection in terms of any such recruitment process along with other candidates applying in response to such recruitment process.4. with these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. however, there will be no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

D.K. Seth, J.

1. Mr. S. P.Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents relied on the decision in the case of U. P. Bijli Karmchari Sangh v. U. P. State Electricity Board and others, in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 14342 of 1999, disposed of by this Court on 7th April, 1999. In the present case, the petitioner alleges to be a retrenched employee. Mr. Shyamji Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that instead of giving re-employment to the petitioner in terms of Section 6Q of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. 1947, the respondents are going to recruit in pursuant to an advertisement Issued only for Schedule Caste and Backward Classes candidate for filling up of different posts. According to Mr. Shyamji Gaur before making such recruitment, the petitioner's case requires a consideration. According to him, by virtue of the said advertisement, the petitioner's right under Section 6Q has been taken away.

2. The Section 6Q of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act does not prescribe that no recruitment at all be made before granting opportunity to retrenched employees under Section 6Q irrespective of the fact of the vacancies sought to be filled up are within the quota of the Schedule Caste and Other Backward Classes. If there are vacancies in the quota of Schedule Caste and Other Backward Classes, in that event, it is to be filled up only by the candidates from Schedule Caste and Backward Classes community. Only when suchcandidates are not available, then the general candidates can be offered for employment. Therefore, the petitioner cannot have any grievance with regard to the advertisement issued seeking to recruit the candidates from the Schedule Caste and other Backward Classes communities for filling up of reserved quota in accordance with law.

3. In case, there are any vacancy, respondent seeks to make any recruitment from the general candidates, in that event, the petitioners may apply for such vacancy. The respondent shall consider such applications in accordance with Section 6Q of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act giving preference in the matter of employment provided each individual petitioner satisfies that he was a retrenched employee and is eligible and entitled to be re-employed in terms of Section 6Q of the said Act while considering the question of selection in terms of any such recruitment process along with other candidates applying in response to such recruitment process.

4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there will be no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial