Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

incha Ram Vs. Emperor

incha Ram vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Apr 21, 1922
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/478450

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 182 - False report to Police--Motive--Offence. - - He had previously sold the horse to his cousin and he clearly made this false report in order to enable him to make a false charge against the man who had bought the horse from his cousin. In making this report he clearly gave...

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

incha Ram

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
71Ind.Cas.216

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 182 - false report to police--motive--offence. - - he had previously sold the horse to his cousin and he clearly made this false report in order to enable him to make a false charge against the man who had bought the horse from his cousin. in making this report he clearly gave false information to the police which he knew to be false and he must have known that it was likely that he would thereby cause the police authorities, if they found the horse answering to his description, to take it from the possession of its rightful owner. on these facts an offence under section 182 was clearly made out.orderstuart, j.1. india ram made a report at the police station that his horse had strayed. this report was false to his knowledge. his horse had not strayed. he had previously sold the horse to his cousin and he clearly made this false report in order to enable him to make a false charge against the man who had bought the horse from his cousin. he made that charge subsequently. in making this report he clearly gave false information to the police which he knew to be false and he must have known that it was likely that he would thereby cause the police authorities, if they found the horse answering to his description, to take it from the possession of its rightful owner. on these facts an offence under section 182 was clearly made out. i accordingly refuse to interfere and return the record.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Stuart, J.

1. India Ram made a report at the Police Station that his horse had strayed. This report was false to his knowledge. His horse had not strayed. He had previously sold the horse to his cousin and he clearly made this false report in order to enable him to make a false charge against the man who had bought the horse from his cousin. He made that charge subsequently. In making this report he clearly gave false information to the Police which he knew to be false and he must have known that it was likely that he would thereby cause the Police Authorities, if they found the horse answering to his description, to take it from the possession of its rightful owner. On these facts an offence under Section 182 was clearly made out. I accordingly refuse to interfere and return the record.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial