Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karamatullah and anr. Vs. Emperor

Karamatullah and anr. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Feb 20, 1920
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/477601

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 183 - Attachment of property--Warrant not signed by Judge--Removal of property--Offence. -

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karamatullah and anr.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
55Ind.Cas.852

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 183 - attachment of property--warrant not signed by judge--removal of property--offence. - walsh, j.1. i accept the reference in this case and direst that the convictions be quashed and the fines, if paid, be refunded.2. with reference to the practice mentioned by the magistrate, the attention of the district magistrate should be drawn to the matter and some circular issued to prevent the repetition of this mistaken practice, so that warrants may be signed in accordance with the provisions of the coda in future.

Full Judgment

Walsh, J.

1. I accept the reference in this case and direst that the convictions be quashed and the fines, if paid, be refunded.

2. With reference to the practice mentioned by the Magistrate, the attention of the District Magistrate should be drawn to the matter and some circular issued to prevent the repetition of this mistaken practice, so that warrants may be signed in accordance with the provisions of the Coda in future.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial