Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of U.P. and Another Vs. Krishna Madho Sharma and Others

State of U.P. and Another vs Krishna Madho Sharma and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Apr 03, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/476511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Special Appeal No. 336 of 1997
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service - Order of absorption - some workers of press became jobless as press stopped printing cause list of Allahabad High Court - printing of cause list started by Government press - workers were not Government employee but they were doing work of High Court - held, authorities are directed to absorb retrenched em...

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of U.P. and Another

Respondent

Krishna Madho Sharma and Others

Legal References

Reported In
2000(2)AWC1726; (2000)IILLJ1065All

Excerpt

service - order of absorption - some workers of press became jobless as press stopped printing cause list of allahabad high court - printing of cause list started by government press - workers were not government employee but they were doing work of high court - held, authorities are directed to absorb retrenched employee. - orders. l. saraf, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.2. this matter relates to the retrenchment of 21 employees who were working in the press run by thebar association, high court, allahabad. sometimes on 4th july, 1988 the printing work of the cause list by the bar association stopped and the high court cause list was printed subsequently by the government press, allahabad. however, that resulted the services of 21 employees of the bar association redundant as no work of the cause list was available any more.3. the question involved is relating to the employment of these 21 persons. in the facts of this case, though the said employees were not the government employees, still they were doing the work of the high court in the capacity as employee of the bar association. it appears from the documents annexed to the petition that the then hon'ble chief justice has also taken on their cause with the judicial secretary/legal remembrancer of the government of uttar pradesh requesting the authorities to consider the case of these persons who were employed by the bar association previously and to absorb them in appropriate job of similar nature. however, over a period of six years nothing appears to have been done. the government though have shown eagerness to offer employment to them, have done nothing.4. in the facts of this case, i feel that it is the obligation and duty of the state government to take sympathetic view in this matter and provide them employment of the similar nature. i direct the authorities to take steps in giving them appropriate employment within a period of six months and absorb them with a job of similar nature.5. with these observations, this petition is accordingly disposed of.let a copy of this order may be given to the learned counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges within three days.

Full Judgment

ORDER

S. L. Saraf, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.

2. This matter relates to the retrenchment of 21 employees who were working in the Press run by theBar Association, High Court, Allahabad. Sometimes on 4th July, 1988 the printing work of the cause list by the Bar Association stopped and the High Court cause list was printed subsequently by the Government Press, Allahabad. However, that resulted the services of 21 employees of the Bar Association redundant as no work of the cause list was available any more.

3. The question involved is relating to the employment of these 21 persons. In the facts of this case, though the said employees were not the Government employees, still they were doing the work of the High Court in the capacity as employee of the Bar Association. It appears from the documents annexed to the petition that the then Hon'ble Chief Justice has also taken on their cause with the Judicial Secretary/Legal Remembrancer of the Government of Uttar Pradesh requesting the authorities to consider the case of these persons who were employed by the Bar Association previously and to absorb them in appropriate job of similar nature. However, over a period of six years nothing appears to have been done. The Government though have shown eagerness to offer employment to them, have done nothing.

4. In the facts of this case, I feel that it is the obligation and duty of the State Government to take sympathetic view in this matter and provide them employment of the similar nature. I direct the authorities to take steps in giving them appropriate employment within a period of six months and absorb them with a Job of similar nature.

5. With these observations, this petition is accordingly disposed of.

Let a copy of this order may be given to the learned counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges within three days.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial