Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dil Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Dil Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 27, 2007
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45181

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dil Limited

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)(118)ECC378

Excerpt

1. the issue for determination in the above appeals against the common order of the commissioner of central excise (appeals) viz., classification of products "dil vit d3-200" and "dil vit d3-500" is no longer res integra as it has been held by the tribunal in the case of glaxo india limited v. cce 1992 (69) elt 124; tetragon chime pvt. ltd. v. cceli taka pharmaceuticals v. cce that such products are of a kind used in animal feeding falling under chapter heading 23.02 even though they are not obtained by processing vegetable or animal material to such an extent that they have lost the essential characteristics of the original material other than vegetable residues and byproducts of such processing.2. in the present case the demands raised in the show cause notices issued to the appellants for classification of the products as mixtures of vitamin under chapter heading 29.36 were dropped by the additional commissioner following the earlier order-in-appeal dated 30/09/1999 of the commissioner (appeals) which was based on the tribunal's judgment in the case of glaxo (india) limited cited supra while the commissioner (appeals) allowed the appeals of the revenue on the ground that the manufacture of the products started with cholesterol acetate which is converted into '7 dehydro cholesterol' then converted into impure vitamin and after esterification/saponification yields crystalline vitamin d-3. which is mixed with solvents, diluents, anti oxidants, etc., and they are not obtained by processing of vegetable or animal material as required in terms of the note to chapter 23 of the schedule to the ceta, 1985.3. there is no dispute that the products are of a kind used in animal feeding. therefore, in the light of the above judgments we hold that they are classifiable under heading 23.02 and set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals.

Full Judgment

1. The issue for determination in the above appeals against the common order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) viz., classification of products "DIL VIT D3-200" and "DIL VIT D3-500" is no longer res Integra as it has been held by the Tribunal in the case of Glaxo India Limited v. CCE 1992 (69) ELT 124; Tetragon Chime Pvt. Ltd. v. CCELi Taka Pharmaceuticals v. CCE that such products are of a kind used in animal feeding falling under Chapter heading 23.02 even though they are not obtained by processing vegetable or animal material to such an extent that they have lost the essential characteristics of the original material other than vegetable residues and byproducts of such processing.

2. In the present case the demands raised in the show cause notices issued to the appellants for classification of the products as mixtures of Vitamin under Chapter heading 29.36 were dropped by the Additional Commissioner following the earlier order-in-appeal dated 30/09/1999 of the Commissioner (Appeals) which was based on the Tribunal's judgment in the case of Glaxo (India) Limited cited supra while the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals of the Revenue on the ground that the manufacture of the products started with Cholesterol Acetate which is converted into '7 Dehydro Cholesterol' then converted into impure vitamin and after esterification/saponification yields crystalline Vitamin D-3. which is mixed with solvents, diluents, anti oxidants, etc., and they are not obtained by processing of vegetable or animal material as required in terms of the note to Chapter 23 of the schedule to the CETA, 1985.

3. There is no dispute that the products are of a kind used in animal feeding. Therefore, in the light of the above judgments we hold that they are classifiable under heading 23.02 and set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial