Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Jaypee Rewa Plant vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 28, 2005
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38265

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaypee Rewa Plant

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(183)ELT305TriDel

Excerpt

1. this is an application by m/s. jaypee rewa plant for waiver of pre-deposit of central excise duty of rs. 6,13,335/- and penalty of rs. 5,000/-.2. shri b.l. narasimhan, learned advocate submitted that the applicants, engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinkers, are availing cenvat credit in respect of lubricating oil; that the department has confirmed the duty on mixed oil sludge which comes out of the machine and the duty has been confirmed as the waste product is nothing but lubricating oil; that no duty is payable as the goods in question is nothing but mixed oil sludge on which no duty is payable as no manufacturing activity has taken place. reliance has been placed on the decision in the case of vikrant tyres ltd. v. commissioner of central excise, mysore - 2004 (171) e.l.t. 23 wherein it has been held that oil coming into existence not as a result of production or manufacture and as such is not excisable. we also heard shri p.k. rai, learned dr who submitted that mixed oil sludge emerges out of modvatable goods on which modvat credit had been availed and as such duty is payable by them.3. we have considered the submissions of both sides. in view of the fact that the product on which duty is being confirmed is sludge, the applicants have made out a strong prima facie case in their favour.accordingly, we stay the recovery of the entire amount of duty and penalty during the pendency of the appeal which is posted for regular hearing on 26-5-2005.

Full Judgment

1. This is an application by M/s. Jaypee Rewa Plant for waiver of pre-deposit of Central Excise duty of Rs. 6,13,335/- and penalty of Rs. 5,000/-.

2. Shri B.L. Narasimhan, learned Advocate submitted that the applicants, engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinkers, are availing cenvat credit in respect of lubricating oil; that the Department has confirmed the duty on mixed oil sludge which comes out of the machine and the duty has been confirmed as the waste product is nothing but lubricating oil; that no duty is payable as the goods in question is nothing but mixed oil sludge on which no duty is payable as no manufacturing activity has taken place. Reliance has been placed on the decision in the case of Vikrant Tyres Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore - 2004 (171) E.L.T. 23 wherein it has been held that oil coming into existence not as a result of production or manufacture and as such is not excisable. We also heard Shri P.K. Rai, learned DR who submitted that mixed oil sludge emerges out of modvatable goods on which Modvat credit had been availed and as such duty is payable by them.

3. We have considered the submissions of both sides. In view of the fact that the product on which duty is being confirmed is sludge, the applicants have made out a strong prima facie case in their favour.

Accordingly, we stay the recovery of the entire amount of duty and penalty during the pendency of the appeal which is posted for regular hearing on 26-5-2005.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial