Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muniyallappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Muniyallappa vs State of Karnataka

Disposition Petition allowed Court Karnataka Decided Oct 21, 1994
~6 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/382081

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P. No. 29765 of 1994
Subject
Property
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 (Karnataka Act No. 12 of 1964) - Sections 94A(5) & 84 : KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE RULES, 1966 - Rule 108G & 105 - Amount payable for grant of land - Assessment under Section 84 & Rule 105 : determination under Section 94A(5) & Rule 108C at two hundred times land revenue ...

Key legal issue
Property
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 84 and 94A(5); Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 - Rules 105, 108C, 108G and 108G(1)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muniyallappa

Advocate P.M. Siddamallappa, Adv.

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Advocate H.H. Kaladgi, HCGP

Legal References

Acts
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 84 and 94A(5); Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 - Rules 105, 108C, 108G and 108G(1)
Reported In
ILR1995KAR255; 1994(5)KarLJ391

Excerpt

karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (karnataka act no. 12 of 1964) - sections 94a(5) & 84 : karnataka land revenue rules, 1966 - rule 108g & 105 - amount payable for grant of land - assessment under section 84 & rule 105 : determination under section 94a(5) & rule 108c at two hundred times land revenue payable.; on a reading of the act and the rules, it is clear that before fixation of the amount payable for the grant of land, it is incumbent upon the concerned statutory authority to assess the land revenue as per section 84 and rules made thereunder. it is only after making a such assessment that the tahsildar can determine the amount payable under section 94a(5) read with rule 108g(1), since the amount payable can only be two hundred times the land revenue payable for such land. in the above view of the matter order demanding rs. 12,000/- per acre for land in question is quashed. - indian electricity act (30 of 2003) section 126: [d.v.shylendra kumar,j] unauthorised use of electricity - demand notice straight away issued to consumer demanding payment of back-billed amount together with interest and penalty, with warning that power supply would be cut-off if demand was not met within thirty days from date of receipt of demand notice held, demand raised without following due procedure prescribed in section 126 (3) of the act, which contemplates, inter alia, issue of provisional assessment order with all necessary details to enable consumer to raise objections which he is entitled to raise, is to be held bad in law and cannot be sustained. demand notice issued in disregard of due procedure is liable to be quashed with liberty to licensee to pass fresh order in accordance with law. - after such enquiry, on being satisfied that the grantee has cut the tree, the tahsildar shall get the value of the tree assessed by the authorities of the forest department and include the same in the amount payable by the grantee......against the said grant. learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impugned order on the ground that though under rule 108-c of the karnataka land revenue rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules') the amount payable under sub-section (5) of section 94-a of the act can be only two hundred times the land revenue payable for the land granted, the tahsildar for his own reasons has arbitrarily fixed rs. 12,000/- per acre without first assessing the land revenue for the land in question in terms of rule 108c. in support of his submission he relied upon a decision of this court in writ petition no. 15601/94 disposed of on 21-9-1994. sri kaladgi, learned high court government pleader does not dispute the said legal position.3. the relevant provisions of the act and the rules are as follows:-'section 94a(5) - the amount payable for the grant of land under sub-section (1) shall be such as may be prescribed'. 'rule 108g. amount payable for grant of land. - the amount payable for the grant of land under section 94a, shall subject to the provisions of sub-rules (2) and (3) be two hundred times the land revenue payable for such land; provided that no amount shall be payable by persons belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. (2) in computing the amount payable for the land, the tahsildar shall not take into consideration the value of any trees standing on the land or improvements made by the applicant during the period of unauthorised occupation. (3) if at the time of determining the amount payable, there is reason to believe that the tree has been cut, the tahsildar shall, verify the entries in the record of rights and hold an enquiry as he deems necessary after giving the grantee an opportunity of being heard. after such enquiry, on being satisfied that the grantee has cut the tree, the tahsildar shall get the value of the tree assessed by the authorities of the forest department and include the same in the amount payable by the grantee. (4).....

Full Judgment

ORDER

Bharuka, J.

1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the sole petitioner questioning the validity of the order dated 25-11-1992 passed by the respondent, Tahsildar (Annexure-A) by which he has fixed Rs. 12,000/- per acre as the value for the land granted in favour of the petitioner in terms of Section 94-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (in short the 'Act').

2. According to the petitioner, pursuant to the application filed by him under Section 94-A of the Act, the Land Grant Committee by its order dated 16.11.1992 directed for grant of 1 acre 20 guntas of land in Sy.No. 1 of Halasahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. Consequent thereupon, the impugned order Annexure 'A' has been passed demanding Rs. 12,000/- per acre by the Tashildar against the said grant. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impugned order on the ground that though under Rule 108-C of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') the amount payable under Sub-section (5) of Section 94-A of the Act can be only two hundred times the land revenue payable for the land granted, the Tahsildar for his own reasons has arbitrarily fixed Rs. 12,000/- per acre without first assessing the Land Revenue for the land in question in terms of Rule 108C. In support of his submission he relied upon a Decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 15601/94 disposed of on 21-9-1994. Sri Kaladgi, learned High Court Government Pleader does not dispute the said legal position.

3. The relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules are as follows:-

'Section 94A(5) - The amount payable for the grant of land under Sub-section (1) shall be such as may be prescribed'.

'Rule 108G. Amount payable for grant of Land. - The amount payable for the grant of land under Section 94A, shall subject to the provisions of Sub-rules (2) and (3) be two hundred times the Land Revenue payable for such land;

Provided that no amount shall be payable by persons belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

(2) In computing the amount payable for the land, the Tahsildar shall not take into consideration the value of any trees standing on the Land or Improvements made by the applicant during the period of unauthorised occupation.

(3) If at the time of determining the amount payable, there is reason to believe that the tree has been cut, the Tahsildar shall, verify the entries in the record of rights and hold an enquiry as he deems necessary after giving the grantee an opportunity of being heard. After such enquiry, on being satisfied that the grantee has cut the tree, the Tahsildar shall get the value of the tree assessed by the authorities of the Forest Department and include the same in the amount payable by the grantee.

(4) Land Revenue Assessment for the entire period of unauthorised occupation shall be collected in addition to the amount payable by the grantee.'

4. Section 84 of the Act reads as follows :-

'84. Assessment by whom to be fixed.- (1) On all lands which are not wholly exempt from the payment of land revenue, and on which assessment has not been fixed under the provisions of Chapter X, the assessment of the amount to be paid as land revenue, shall, subject to such rules as may be made by the State Government in this behalf, be fixed by the Deputy Commissioner, for such period not exceeding the maximum prescribed as the State Government may, by general or special order, specify, and the amounts due according to such assessment shall be levied on all such lands;

Provided that in the case of lands partially exempt from land revenue, or the liability of which to the payment of land revenue is subject to special conditions or restrictions, regard shall be had in the fixing of the assessment and the levy of the revenue to all rights legally subsisting according to the nature of the said rights:

Provided further that where any land which was wholly or partially exempt from payment of land revenue has ceased to be so exempt, it shall be lawful for the Deputy Commissioner to fix the assessment of the amount to be paid as land revenue for such land, with effect from the date on which such land ceased to be so exempt of any subsequent date, as he may deem fit. (2) After the expiry of the period for which the assessment of any land is fixed under Sub-section (1), the Deputy Commissioner may from time to time revise the same in accordance with the rules made in this behalf by the State Government. The assessment so revised shall be fixed each time for such period not exceeding the maximum prescribed as the State Government may, by general or special order, specify.'

'Rule 105. Assessment of land revenue of lands not already assessed under Chapter X of the Act.- Where assessment has not been fixed on any land not wholly exempt from land revenue under Chapter X of the Act, the Deputy Commissioner of the District in which the land is situate shall fix the same for a period not exceeding five years taking into account the land revenue assessment prevailing for similar and contiguous lands in the local area concerned.'

5. On a reading of the Act and the Rules as noticed above, it is clear that before fixation of the amount payable for the grant of land, it is incumbent upon the concerned statutory authority to assess the land revenue as per Section 84 and the Rules made thereunder. It is only after making of such assessment, that the Tahsildar can determine the amount payable under Section 94-A(5) read with Rule 108G(1), since the amount payable can only be two hundred times the land revenue payable for such land.

6. In the above view of the matter the order Annexure 'A' demanding Rs. 12,000/- per acre for grant of land in question is quashed. Respondent-Authorities are directed to assess the land revenue payable in respect of the land in question and thereafter create a demand for the price of the land granted as provided under the Act and the Rules.

7. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to the said extent.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial