Full Judgment
2. None has come present on behalf of the respondents. No request for adjournment has been received from them. Therefore, we proceed to decide the appeal after hearing the learned JDR.3. We have gone through the record and impugned order. We find that waste and scrap cleared by the respondents during the period in dispute was of burnt copper wire. Such a scrap does not find any classification under any tariff heading. It also could not be said to be the result of process of manufacture. Therefore, the conditions laid down under Rule 57-S(2)(c) for charging duty on such a waste and scrap do not stand satisfied. The view taken by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is therefore, perfectly valid and legal. We do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the same. Therefore, the impugned Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is upheld. The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.