Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moolannagappa Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Moolannagappa vs The State of Karnataka and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 09, 1978
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/375158

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petn. No. 5899 of 1978
Subject
Contract;Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 [C.A. No. 59/1988]Section 168; [Ram Mohan Reddy, J] Quantum of compensation Bodily injury - Held, Bodily injury is to be treated as deprivation entitling the claimant to damages, the amount of which varies according to the gravity of the injury. Deprivation due to injuries brings with it...

Key legal issue
Contract;Constitution
Acts & sections
Karnataka Excise Act, 1965; Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moolannagappa

Respondent

The State of Karnataka and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1979Kant15

Excerpt

.....of recreation which appeal to the ordinary healthy man. the impairment to the right upper arm causing disability of 35% naturally interferes with normal conduct of life or prevents sexual relation, warranting substantial damage on that ground. in fact, the appellant, young and energetic with great ambitions and expectations in life wanting to earn more money, due to the impairment, has occasioned loss of an enjoyable or interesting career too. the disfigurement in the form of a scar as notice by the doctor in his testimony is more serious when the appellant becomes very conscious of the disfigurement and avoids social occasions. the elbow joint in the upper limb in a human frame is of utmost importance, not that the other bones constituting the frame are not. with the partial permanent injury to the upper limb of the appellant, he will have to endure the disability for the rest of his life. in the result, the compensation was enhanced to rs.3,40,420/- with interest at 6% p.a. (rs.50,000/- towards loss of amenities of life, happiness, frustration; rs.35,000/- towards loss of marriage prospects; rs.15,000/- towards conveyance, attendant charges, food and nourishment; rs.50,000/- towards pain, shock , suffering and two fractures to the right upper arm; rs.97,920/- towards loss of future earning due to disability; rs.16,000/- towards loss of earning during laid off period; rs.15,000/- towards future medical expenses; rs.25,000/- towards loss of expectation of life and rs.36,500/- towards medical expenses). - as the petitioner complied with the requirements of the rules and the terms and conditions of the sale notification dated 30-3-1978 and as the sale price was higher than the sale price of the current year, the deputy commissioner while provisionally accepting the highest bid of the petitioner, recommended to the government through the excise commissioner for its confirmation under sub-r. on an examination of the sale records, the excise commissioner being of..........of all the 11 taluks in all aggregating to rs. 1,18,000/- per month as against the previous bid amount of rs. 1,10,000/- per month for the said taluks for the current excise year viz., from 1-7-1977 to 30-6-1978. on an examination of the relevant factors, the rules and the terms and conditions of the sale notification, the deputy commissioner, bijapur, exercising the powers conferred on him by sub-r. (1) of r. 15 of the 1969 rules provisionally accepted the highest bid offered by the petitioner and called upon him to deposit one month's rent amounting to rupees 1,18,000/- on the same day which was also complied by him. as the petitioner complied with the requirements of the rules and the terms and conditions of the sale notification dated 30-3-1978 and as the sale price was higher than the sale price of the current year, the deputy commissioner while provisionally accepting the highest bid of the petitioner, recommended to the government through the excise commissioner for its confirmation under sub-r. (2) of r. 15 of the 1969 rules. on an examination of the sale records, the excise commissioner being of the opinion that there was no loss of revenue as such but the confirmation of the bids would lead to smuggling of toddy from bijapur district to gulbarga district, recommended to the government not to confirm the sales and re-auction the right of retail vend of toddy in the 11 taluks of bijapur district. it is desirable to notice the recommendation of the excise commissioner to government in his own words and the same reads thus:-'in respect of toddy, the bids offered in all the taluks are comparatively higher than the current year's rentals. there is an increase of rs. 8,100/- per month over the current years' rentals. he has provisionally accepted all the bids offered in respect of eleven taluks of bijapur district and recommended the bids for confirmation. viewed only from the yardstick of rental of bijapur district, the bids appear reasonable. however, in.....

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. In accordance with the provisions of the Karnataka Excise Act of 1965 (Karnataka Act No. 21 of 1966) (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1966 Act') and the Karnataka Excise (Lease of the Right of Retail Vend of Liquors) Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1969 Rules'), the Excise Commissioner in Karnataka, Bangalore, by his Notification dated 30th March, 1978 (Exhibit A), (published in the Karnataka Gazette Extraordinary dated 12th April, 1978) among others, notified that the lease of the right of retail vend of toddy in the 11 Taluks of Bijapur District for the excise year 1978-79 i.e. from 1-7-1978 to 30-6-1979 (both days inclusive) will be disposed of in public auction by the Deputy Commissioner, Bijapur District, on 28-4-1978. In the public auction held on 28-4-1978, the petitioner qualified to bid offered the highest bid in respect of all the 11 Taluks in all aggregating to Rs. 1,18,000/- per month as against the previous bid amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- per month for the said Taluks for the current excise year viz., from 1-7-1977 to 30-6-1978. On an examination of the relevant factors, the rules and the terms and conditions of the sale Notification, the Deputy Commissioner, Bijapur, exercising the powers conferred on him by sub-r. (1) of R. 15 of the 1969 Rules provisionally accepted the highest bid offered by the petitioner and called upon him to deposit one month's rent amounting to Rupees 1,18,000/- on the same day which was also complied by him. As the petitioner complied with the requirements of the rules and the terms and conditions of the sale notification dated 30-3-1978 and as the sale price was higher than the sale price of the current year, the Deputy Commissioner while provisionally accepting the highest bid of the petitioner, recommended to the Government through the Excise Commissioner for its confirmation under sub-r. (2) of R. 15 of the 1969 Rules. On an examination of the sale records, the Excise Commissioner being of the opinion that there was no loss of revenue as such but the confirmation of the bids would lead to smuggling of toddy from Bijapur District to Gulbarga District, recommended to the Government not to confirm the sales and re-auction the right of retail vend of toddy in the 11 Taluks of Bijapur District. It is desirable to notice the recommendation of the Excise Commissioner to Government in his own words and the same reads thus:-

'In respect of toddy, the bids offered in all the taluks are comparatively higher than the current year's rentals. There is an increase of Rs. 8,100/- per month over the current years' rentals. He has provisionally accepted all the bids offered in respect of eleven taluks of Bijapur District and recommended the bids for confirmation. Viewed only from the yardstick of rental of Bijapur District, the bids appear reasonable. However, in neighboring District of Gulbarga, the rentals from toddy shop leases are much higher. The rentals from toddy have increased from Rs. 5,00,600/- P.M. in 1977-78 to Rs. 7,98,100/- P.M. as bid for 1978-79. In contrast, for Bijapur District the rentals have increased only from Rupees 13,20,000/- per annum to Rs. 14,17,200/-. The increase of Rs. 97,200/- per annum percentage wise and in absolute terms is far less in Bijapur District than the similar figures for Gulbarga District. If therefore the bids for Bijapur District in respect of toddy are accepted, the danger is that Bijapur District will become a toddy spring Board for smuggling of toddy into Gulbarga District. This will affect the Administration severely. In the light of the auctions in Gulbarga District it becomes necessary to re-examine whether higher rentals can be secured by re-auction of toddy shop leases in Bijapur Dist. Therefore, I recommend re-auction of toddy shop leases in Bijapur District and consequently the recommendations of the Deputy Commissioner, Bijapur, seeking confirmation of the highest bids, have to be turned down.'

Accepting the above recommendation of the Excise Commissioner, the Government by its order dated 15-5-1978 (Exhibit 'B') has refused to confirm the highest bid offered by the petitioner for the purchase of the right of retail vend of toddy of 11 taluks of Bijapur District on the ground that the same was in the interest of the revenue. The order of the Government reads thus:--

'GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka Government

Secretariat,

Vidhan Soudha,

Bangalore,

Dated 15th May, 1978

No. HD 84 EDC 78

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial