Advanced Search Results

Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. Vs. Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, D ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 253; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; International Development Association (Status, Immunities and Privilages) Act, 1960 - Sections 3

leading to this appeal may be summarized as follows :(i) The present dispute relates to the award of contract for supply of 449 tractors to the Agriculture Department, Government of Assam, to be procured by the Government … Anglo-Saxon principles of law? Is it essential for being impleaded in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India that the person sought to be impleaded as a party is a person or authority or

i.V.R. Constructions Ltd. Vs. Sukdevraj Sharma and Bros and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 26 and 226; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 14

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD467; 1998(6)ALT245

of the impugned action of the Company, the valuable right of the petitioners under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution is affected. Thus, the petitioners have locus standi to file the writ petition and question the action of … the writ petition.6. The facts which are not in dispute are as follows: The petitioners are 'S' Class contractors. The 2nd respondent issued a noticeinviting tenders for construction of Gateway Technical Building for Videsh Sanchar Nigani Ltd.,

Sharad Manilal Gosalia Vs. Superintending Engineer, Government of Goa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR244

H.W. Dhabe, J.1. The petitioner challenges in this petition the award of the works contract in question to the respondents No. 4 and claims that the same should have been awarded to him, … instead to the respondent No. 4 on 5-8-1989 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. He has also claimed a writ of mandamus that the respondents 1 to 3 be directed to accept

Manjunatha Overseas Granite Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Contract Act; Rent Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141 and 226

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2553; 2009(5)KarLJ412

27.11.2003. Confirming the same, cheques were also issued on 27.li.2C03 by the petitioner, which amounts to a concluded contract. Therefore it is contended that the impugned proceedings dated 17.11.2003 and the respondent going back from the earlier … obligations entered into between the parties by exercising the power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as held in ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. : (2004)3SCC553

National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Bhanu Construction Co. P. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 32 and 226; Specifice Relief Act - Sections 45; Mysore Excise Act; Mysore Excise Rules; Revenue Recovery Act; Indian Contract Act; Arbitration Act - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1989AP140; [1991]72CompCas247(AP)

of 220 Kilometres, between Shankargarh and Kanpur, valued at Rs. 598 Lakhs awarded on 7-12-1984. The terms of contract are stated in the award letter which is accompanied by conditions of contract and technical specifications. According to … survival in : jeopardy and, therefore, this is a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. So far as the allegations made by both the parties against each other of several defaults and delays

Pallava Granite Industries India Private Limited Vs. Andhra Pradesh Mi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 226

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD230; 2005(4)ALT79; 2006(1)CTLJ55(AP)

M & S-39/VGG-SB/04 through the proceedings dated 6-5-2004 as arbitrary and illegal and to further declare that the contract is frustrated and to refund Rs. 47,82,575/- with interest.2. The petitioner is a company carrying on business of … the following are the points taken up for consideration:(1) Whether the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable to enforce a contractual obligation of the respondent in favour of the petitioner and

Utkal Highways and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Contract Act; Sale of Goods Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2006Chh29

propriety and correctness of the order dated 15-4-2004 whereby respondent No. 2, the Executive Engineer has terminated the contract dated 11-3-2003 entered into between the Water Resources Department and the petitioner herein to execute the work of … L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioner M/s. Utkal Highways through its partners has questioned the propriety and correctness of the order

Harmesh Chand Vs. the Food Corporation of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)137PLR37

also sent by the petitioner on 24.4.2003. The petitioner through this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenges the impugned order, Annexure P12 illegally terminating the contract which had been awarded to the … the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the FCI') for inviting tenders for handling and transport contractor at Food Storage Depot of the FCI at Nakodar. The petitioner submitted his tender, which was accepted by

Graham Satyam Shankaranarayna Jv Partnership Vs. National Highways Aut ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)117; AIR1997Delhi122; 1997(1)ARBLR59(Delhi); 70(1997)DLT161; 1996(39)DRJ309

is directed against respondent No.1 for setting aside the decision to reject the petitioner's bid and award of contract in favor of respondent No.2 in respect of tender for National Highways Project under loan assistance from the … and is an instrumentality of the State and a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Respondent No.2 is a Joint Venture between a Malaysian and an Indian company and is a

Kirorilal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1977Raj101; 1976(9)WLN652

and Geology Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, for the extraction of sand (Bajri) from Rameshwar Ghat, was a contract in conformity with Article 299(1) of the Constitution and, therefore, a valid and binding contract came into existence;