Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chadha Metals Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Chadha Metals vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 01, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/36664

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chadha Metals

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2005)(179)ELT78TriDel

Excerpt

1. the dispute in the present appeal is, whether 'aluminium scrap isri grade throb', is to be classified under heading 7601 or 7602. the impugned order has held that the item will be classifiable under heading 7601 as 'unwrought aluminium', and not under heading 7602 as 'aluminium waste and scrap'. the learned counsel for the appellants has pointed out that in the international trade of aluminium scrap isri grade throb, is specifically recognized as 'aluminium scrap' and not as 'unwrought aluminium'. further, dgft also has adopted this classification in its eight digit classification. the learned counsel has also pointed out that when eight digit classification was introduced into the customs tariff in 2004, under 76020000.10 various types of scrap have been specifically named and one such variety of scrap is 'throb'. in view of this, the learned counsel has contended that correct classification under the earlier scheme was 7602 as "aluminium waste and scrap".2. we have heard the learned jdr who has referred to hsn note under 7602 which states that "ingots and similar unwrought forms, cast from remelted aluminium waste and scrap" are excluded from heading 7602.3. the 8 digits classification from the year 2004 is only a more detailed and expanded classification. this tariff specifically mentions "throb" under heading 7602 as aluminium waste. that was the classification adopted by the dgft earlier also. there is nothing on the record to show that the imported items are cast from remelted aluminium waste and scrap so as to get excluded from 7602. in these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the finding in the impugned order regarding the classification of the item is not sustainable.therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any, permissible to the appellants.

Full Judgment

1. The dispute in the present appeal is, whether 'Aluminium Scrap ISRI Grade Throb', is to be classified under Heading 7601 or 7602. The impugned order has held that the item will be classifiable under Heading 7601 as 'Unwrought Aluminium', and not under Heading 7602 as 'Aluminium Waste and Scrap'. The learned Counsel for the appellants has pointed out that in the international trade of Aluminium Scrap ISRI Grade Throb, is specifically recognized as 'Aluminium Scrap' and not as 'Unwrought Aluminium'. Further, DGFT also has adopted this classification in its eight digit classification. The learned Counsel has also pointed out that when eight digit classification was introduced into the Customs Tariff in 2004, under 76020000.10 various types of scrap have been specifically named and one such variety of scrap is 'Throb'. In view of this, the learned Counsel has contended that correct classification under the earlier scheme was 7602 as "Aluminium Waste and Scrap".

2. We have heard the learned JDR who has referred to HSN Note under 7602 which states that "ingots and similar unwrought forms, cast from remelted aluminium waste and scrap" are excluded from Heading 7602.

3. The 8 digits classification from the year 2004 is only a more detailed and expanded classification. This tariff specifically mentions "Throb" under Heading 7602 as aluminium waste. That was the classification adopted by the DGFT earlier also. There is nothing on the record to show that the imported items are cast from remelted aluminium waste and scrap so as to get excluded from 7602. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the finding in the impugned order regarding the classification of the item is not sustainable.

Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any, permissible to the appellants.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial